Answer: correlation vs. causation
Explanation:
Correlation assesses the relationship between variables and can be in the same direction, where the increase in one exists as the same time as an increase in the other variable or inverse where an increase in one variable occurs when there is a decrease in the second variable. However, this correlation does not indicate causation.
Causation signifies that one variable is responsible for the occurrence of an event in the other variable. Clearly, there is no cause and effect between the number of mules and doctorate degrees in a state. Here, there is a correlation but a fundamental causative factor is absent between the two events.
The primary rule of ball placement is to position the ball wherein the receiver could make a catch.
The quantity rule is to locate the ball far from a defender. If the receiver is in the open subject, which means putting the ball on his front shoulder so he can keep momentum and maximize his yards after the seize.
Passing performs are performs where the quarterback throws the ball to a receiver rather than handing it off to the going for walks again. Skip sorts are the distinctive variations of passes used on passing performances.
To the ground. Intentional grounding – A penalty while a quarterback. deliberately throws the ball in an area where none of his receivers can. capture it or in a place without any receivers in an try to avoid being. tackled for a lack of yardage.
Learn more about ball placement here: brainly.com/question/14833885
#SPJ4
Answer:
"Traits"
Explanation:
According to my research I can say that based on the description being provided within the question, the term being described are "Traits". This term can also be defined as the characteristics that make an individual unique and determines the kind of person that they are.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
<h3>
Answer: A. competition among producers</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
Competition reduces prices while also increasing the quality of the product or service. Companies that don't do such things will likely be out of business since the customer can go elsewhere for a better experience. The more competition, the better consumers are off.
In contrast, monopolies are bad for consumers because one company can set the price to whatever they want (to a certain level of course) and the customer has no choice to pay that price. The customer does not have any other option so the company is in full control. This leads to decline in quality because quality is often associated with cost. Safety standards may decline as well. So this is why monopolies are not good for the customer. In cases where there are monopolies, such as with power utilities, it is strongly advised that government regulations are put in place. This way the company doesn't completely exploit the customer.
In short, we can eliminate choice D because it runs counter to choice A.
Choice C can also be eliminated because if you had a decrease in supply, then the price of the product is likely to go up if you hold other factors in check (such as keeping the same level of demand). Higher prices do not benefit consumers unless those consumers had an equal or better wage increase.
A raise in interest rates means that it becomes more expensive to borrow money. For example, a raise in interest rates means that mortgage rates go higher. This negative is slightly counterbalanced with the fact that savings accounts interest rates go up as well. Overall, I think a rise in interest rates means that consumers ultimately pay more, so we can cross choice B off the list as well.
