1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
3241004551 [841]
2 years ago
11

How far should you stop from The nearest railroad crossing if a flagger is warning of a upcoming train

Law
1 answer:
Alisiya [41]2 years ago
3 0
15-50 feet from the track of the railroad
You might be interested in
Rawls and Nozick both agree that : a)the law should embody no conception of the good life b)in the name of liberty the governmen
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

d) redistributive taxation is unjust unless it remedies some past injustice

Explanation:

Rawls and Nozick were two American Philosophers, who took stand for inequality and injustice in U.S.

They both oppose the progressive system, which favors increase of tax as a share of the base size increases.

According to Rawls and Nozick, redistributive taxation should provide benefit to the people who have faced injustice in past through any mechanism such as schools, direct transfer, health care or other program that improve prospects of the poorest and injustice people.

Hence, the correct answer is d.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the less eligibility principle, as applied to corrections?
zepelin [54]

Answer:

the principal of less eligibility stipulates that if imprisonment is to act as a deterrent the treatment given a prisoner should not be superior to that provided a member of the lowest significant social class in the free society.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
The Magna Carta, in establishing certain rights and protections of medieval barons against arbitrary rule by the English King, w
velikii [3]

Answer:

C. limited government

Hope this helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In his arguments in brown v. board of education, the lawyer for linda brown claimed that "separate but equal" public schools wer
blsea [12.9K]

In Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for the prosecution by Linda Brown argued that public schools were separate but not truly equal.

<h3>What was argued in Brown v. Board of Education?</h3>

The prosecution argued that even though the American public school system was separate, it was not equal.

This was because White Only schools got more resources which allowed their students to be more successful.

Find out more on Brown v. Board of Education at brainly.com/question/9857823.

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the cars below may pass?
e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Since there are two lanes, B may simply pass in the left lane

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Question: What is a sentence?
    14·1 answer
  • New adaptations first come about by
    5·1 answer
  • The W-2 form is a form that tells you _______.
    8·1 answer
  • If a(n) _____ is set for the defendant, he or she is entitled to stay at his or her home until the trial date.
    11·2 answers
  • Before packaging a bullet, it's important to remove any trace material, such as paint or fibers. True or False?
    8·1 answer
  • Easy way to learn question answer in exam​
    10·2 answers
  • Criminal law spells out the rights and duties that exist between individuals. true or false
    6·1 answer
  • 4. What is important when using technology?
    11·2 answers
  • My Dad is coming back ?
    10·2 answers
  • Under which exception can a police officer legally enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!