Answer:37.4x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Notice that function 
has the exat shape of function 
, and it has just be translated to the right by 3 whole units.
Recall that horizontal translations to the right involve subtracting the number of units moved in the translation from the variable "x". therefore, in our case this means:
Answer:
It is not a function
Step-by-step explanation:
The plot shows (1, 1) and (1, 3) are both defined by the relation. It does not pass the "vertical line test", which requires the relation be single-valued everywhere.
This equation is an example of a Limacon with inner loop. By using the symmetry tests where:
POLAR AXIS/HORIZONTAL:
replace a) θ by -θ, b) r by -r and θ by π-<span>θ
VERTICAL AXIS:
replace a) </span>θ by π-θ, b) r by -r and θ by -<span>θ
POLE:
replace a) </span>θ by π+<span>θ, b) r by -r
If any of these rules, after replacing it in the equation, results to the original equation (making it the equivalent) then it is symmetrical to that axis.
In this case, it is only symmetrical about the polar/horizontal axis. </span>
Answer:
-12.5 i think
Step-by-step explanation:
