Just like think of what they have in common and what they don't have in common
Answer:
A. If my answer is wrong, please correct me :).
Explanation:
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
converse is basically the "chit-chat" of a conversation.
Explanation: what that means is the conversation goes on for hours. it's the detailed part of the convo...does that make sense??
