The answer is:
life of slaves and white people in the South in 1830s
Kashmir's water resources are the primary resource value in the region. As of 2014, Pakistan is facing water scarcity. Kashmir has rich rivers, glaciers and other water resources. India is building hydroelectric plants on some of the rivers in areas it controls, which provide valuable electricity. Due to its mountainous nature, Kashmir also provides high ground for military conflicts, and some important supply routes run through it.<span>The dispute over Kashmir has been dividing India and Pakistan since the nations were first freed from British rule. Jammu and Kashmir state, the India-controlled portion of the region, has a majority Muslim population like Pakistan. India and Pakistan are both nuclear powers and have been in conflict since they gained independence in 1947. They have come dangerously close to nuclear warfare at times, and their inability to work together as allies contributes to the instability of the region. Finding a diplomatic solution to the dispute over Kashmir could significantly repair relations between the two countries, which may have positive implications for peace in South Asia and the Middle East. hope it helps :)
</span>
Answer:
D. Due care
Explanation:
In business, due care refers to the act of always maintaining reasonable behavior that wouldn't harm other people . The 'harm' could include both social or monetary harm.
Directors held one of the highest position in the company.
Due to their important status, every action that they make often used by other people to judge the company where they work in. If for example, the directors are behaving badly in public, more consumers will view that companies negatively.
Because of this, other board of directors often voted out one of the directors who misbehave in order to maintain the reputation of the company.
Answer:
Democracy itself is defined through the concept of institution. A democracy, Przeworski told us, is possible when the relevant political forces can find institutions that give a reasonable guarantee that their interests will not be affected in an extremely adverse way in democratic competition, that is, when interests are subjected to institutionalized uncertainty. (1986). Trust in institutions is closely linked to political culture. Almond and Verba in The Civic Culture: political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (1963) in a study carried out in 1959, they detect that in what they call a modern society there is much more participation, the key for them would be in the political culture. This refers to the attitude of individuals towards the political system and the role they play as individuals within it. Both attitudes, according to Almond and Verba, can be appreciated through certain patterns of orientation towards the political objects of a nation. These patterns can be of four forms: political orientation, which refers to the internalization of the objects of the political system and the relationships between these objects: the cognitive orientation of the system, which refers to the knowledge of what there is, for example the results of public policy; affective orientation, which focuses on feelings towards the political system, its roles, and functioning; and finally, evaluative orientation, which unites the elements of the previous orientations and allows generating evaluative criteria. Trust in institutions permeates these three levels of political orientation. Finally, Frederick C. Turner and John D. Martz (1997) have analyzed the case of Latin America, where the trust of citizens in institutions is an essential factor for the consolidation of democracy. Ludolfo Paramio (1999) argues that party identification and trust in institutions are conditions for the proper functioning of democracy. In short, institutions are the basis, feed and give value to democracy through various mechanisms at different times. March and Olsen (2006) point out that there are various theoretical approaches to institutions that are distinguished mainly by: first, how they conceive the nature of institutions; second, how they explain the processes that translate into structures and rules and their political impacts, and, lastly, the processes that turn human behavior into rules and structures to maintain, transform or eliminate institutions
