Answer:The answer is Deep customer knowledge
Explanation:
Deep customer knowledge is a kind of research done by a business in order to know the need of their customers and how the business can help in meeting such need.it is a process of engaging with their customers with a view to know their need so as to ensure that the overall objectives of the business is accomplished. Deep customer knowledge enables a business to build a strong relationships with their customers. The use of deep customer knowledge includes the use of customers service officer to explain to their customers the use of their products or services in order to ensure that they are able to satisfy their customers and improve the sales of the business.
A cooperative. <span>A </span>cooperative--<span>a business owned by a group of people to meet mutual (economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations).</span>
Answer:
wavelength of the second photon emitted is 97.26 nm
Explanation:
Data provided;
Wavelength absorbed = 94.98 nm
Wavelength of the one of the emitted photon = 4052.3 nm
Now,
The energy is given as:
Energy = 
here,
h is the plank's constant
c is the speed of the light
λ is the wavelength
Now,
by the principle of conservation of energy
Initial energy = Final energy
Therefore,
= 
+ 
or
= -
or
= 
- 
or
= 0.0105 - 2.46 × 10⁻⁴
or
= 0.01028
or
λ₁ = 97.26 nm
Hence,
the wavelength of the second photon emitted is 97.26 nm
Answer:
No, Jim is not correct.
Explanation:
Betty will win this case.
Generally, the law encourages marriage as its policy. If there is any contract that prevent or restrict marriage in whatever way, such contract would be considered null and void because it is against the public policy.
Despite the above, contracts will be generally considered valid when they place reasonable restrictions on marriage. In this question, the restriction placed on Betty that she should get married until after her 22nd birthday is reasonable and has to be considered to be valid. Based on this, Betty has to be paid the $25,000 as laid down in the binding contract between the two parties.
Therefore, Jim is not correct.
