Answer:
A) Yes, because the firm could sell the warehouse if it didn’t use it for the new project.
Explanation:
- The option A is correct in our scenario, because the firm still have the option to sale the warehouse even they want to use it for the new project.
- The option B is not correct as the cost of warehouse is not sunk cost, such a cost that has been utilized and can't be recovered, but we can sale the warehouse and get the payment.
- The option C is incorrect as once the project is complete then it would be a part of that project so they will not sale the warehouse.
You would have to divide the number of bushels by the price.
Answer:
The operators have not violated the antitrust laws because they are only collaborating to lobby the government
Explanation:
The antitrust law in the U.S. can be described as a group of federal and state government laws enacted to regulate the activities of business firms in order to enhance competition to the advantage of consumers.
The antitrust law aims to collusive activities that suppress trade, any merger and acquisition that would reduce competition, and prevent the the abuse of monopoly power.
Since the activity of the operators of adult bookstores does not fall under what the antitrust law aims to prevent but it is just a collaboration to lobby the government, they have a good defense that they have not violated the antitrust laws.
Answer:
cumulative discounts
Explanation:
Options:
- A) allowance
- B )cash
- C) seasonal
- D) noncumulative
- E) cumulative
A cumulative discount refers to a company offering a discount in the sales price of an item or items if the total purchase is higher than a certain threshold. It is similar to offering discounts for buying in bulk (which refers to quantity), only that this type of discount is offered to customers that purchase over a certain amount of money.
