Answer:
Organizations are responding to social media complaints using all of the methods indicated. This provides more tools to avoid any type of repercussions.
Explanation:
- Adding non-disparagement clauses in consumer contracts. When someone downloads an app, a user must accept an agreement, sometimes so extense and complicated, that the user will just click <em>Accept</em>. T<u>hese agreements or contracts could include protections</u> so costumers don't speak negatively about a company.
- Increasing the legal staff in the organization. In the case of legal actions, the best protection is to have several attorneys<em> preparing documentation in advance</em> and <u>receiving notification of all potential complaints from community managers</u>.
- Zeroing in one statement that is not true and ignoring the rest. The community manager can take action reducing importance to any complaint created by a consumer, and disregard all related comments. This will make appear the <em>complaint as something unfounded </em>and will lose importance to the eyes of other consumers.
- Deleting unfriendly posts. The most aggressive form of control, and the one that could affect the corporative image the most. Since customers are denouncing something that feels is affecting them directly, the deletion of this complain could be seen as censorship, and tyrannic. Even though the company <u>could set rules</u> to avoid discrimination and violence on their social networks, a comment sent to get help about a situation that affects a customer directly is not correct from a <em>marketing or public relations stand.</em>
The personality view, that is, the impression a person makes on others, emphasizes a person's public reputation.
<h3 /><h3>Big five personality traits</h3>
It is a theory developed by psychologists of identifying five major personality traits that an individual can develop. It is an empirical method based on scientific research that is more accepted today. The five traits are:
- Openness to experience
- Conscientiousness
- Extraversion
- Neuroticism
- Agreeableness
Therefore, through personality trait identification tests, it is possible to understand more about an individual and their personal motivations.
The correct answer is:
Find out more information about personality traits here:
brainly.com/question/6706305
Answer:
The answer is oligarchy.
Explanation:
oligarchy was ruled by a few people and they had to be upper class and rich to rule.
Answer:
The answer is: she was emphasizing scentific evidence that supports her speech.
Explanation:
when delivering a speech, people use persuasive strategies that help them support the argument they are making. In this case, Ariana was demonstrating relevance of the negative effects of sleep by emphasizing existing scientific evidence; she mentions that it has been proven that there is a link between a lack of sleep during school week and poor academic performance. By using this data as a persuasive tool, she can make a stronger speech because it is based on objective information rather than on a subjective belief.
Overall, the question “Why did the United States refuse to join the League of Nations?” can be answered simply by looking at the reaction of important American leaders during the time period of when the United States was debating joining the League of Nations. Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points were a great foundation for the future United Nations and also an important starting point for the League of Nations, but the intense multilateralism that was expected of nations in the League had caused the United States to shy away from any possible agreement to be made. At the time of Treaty of Versailles and the development of the League of Nations, the United States chose to focus on growing as a nation itself, as opposed to potentially being dragged into more conflict that the Americans felt was no threat to their own nation. This is why Lodges Reservations were appreciated by many of the United States Senators when the time came to vote upon entry into the League of Nations. These reservations were important as it posed the fears of the United States in having their somewhat newly independence stripped from them in the form of being forced to defend a nation, attack a nation, or restrict imports and exports to and from a specific country. Ultimately, it falls down to the simple fact that the United States did not need the support of other nations to protect its land and independence, as well as the rebuild its land because it was not nearly as affected as nations like France and Britain who were devastated financially and morally after the brutal conditions of the war. Had the United States lost as much as the other countries that joined the United Nations, I believe that they would have quickly joined the League of Nations, and potentially become a global superpower, much like what occured after the Second World War in regard to the United Nations. However, this was not the case and the United States refused to join the League of Nations, which greatly hurt its reputation and power.
