Include nursing advocacy actions as well as interventions that are particularly geared toward meeting her spiritual and cultural needs.
<h3>
What do you mean by Nursing Advocacy?</h3>
Nursing advocacy tactics can safeguard patients' rights, keep them safe, and enhance communities. Successful nurses are adept at promoting healthcare reforms that benefit both specific patients and larger groups of people. In this post, we'll talk about nursing advocacy tactics, why they're important, and how nurses may speak up for their patients and communities in a powerful way. Typically, the term "nursing advocacy" relates to nurses aiding their patients. Helping patients comprehend their medical conditions and treatments, defending their legal rights, and doing a variety of additional measures on their behalf are all examples of nursing advocacy.
To know more about Nursing visit:
brainly.com/question/28342744
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
A direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of government wherein the citizens have a direct say in the formulation of laws and issues that affect them while a representative democracy is a form of government wherein its citizens vote for or elect a representative to represent them in Congress or the Senate.
In a direct democracy people vote on policies directly such as the Brexit referendum where people got to directly influence the outcome of the result.
In a representative democracy people vote for representatives who present a particular plan, ideas and policies and ask people to vote for them. Whomever gets the majority vote has a mandate to carry out his policies. In this system the voter does not have direct control over the outcome.
Germany, austria-hungary, italy
Answer:
The correct answer is option E.
Explanation:
Crowding out effect refers to the situation when an increase in the government spending causes investment spending to decline. When government increases spending it borrows fund. This causes an increase in the demand for loanable funds. As a result, the interest rate increases.
This increase in interest rate causes private investment to decline. this further causes a reduction in consumption.
Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
