1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
15

What is water and gravel mixed together

History
2 answers:
I am Lyosha [343]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a heterogeneous mixture.

Explanation:

i think bc two different mixture are a heterogeneous mixture.

sergejj [24]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: a heterogeneous mixture.

 

Explanation:

i think bc two different mixuter are a heterogeneous mixture.

You might be interested in
Which of these was an argument for the New Jersey Plan?
algol [13]

It would provide equal representation for each state.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these states is located in the area acquired by the U.S. in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?
Margarita [4]
Gained New Mexico and California.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following circumstances most contributed to the growth of new home construction is Arizona during the postwar era?
jeka94

Many former soldiers moved to Phoenix.

5 0
3 years ago
What circumstances in the south led to the struggle of African Americans for equal rights
Nutka1998 [239]

Segregation of the " Black And Whites"

7 0
3 years ago
Discuss how that person exemplified at least three characteristics of great leadership or heroism.
OLEGan [10]

Answer:

Have you ever heard the phrase, "Great leaders are born, not made"? This quote sums up the basic tenant of the great man theory of leadership, which suggests that the capacity for leadership is inborn. According to this theory, you're either a natural born leader or you're not.

The term "Great Man" was used because, at the time, ​leadership was thought of primarily as a male quality, especially in terms of military leadership.

History

The great man theory of leadership became popular during the 19th-century. The mythology behind some of the world's most famous leaders such as Abraham Lincoln, Julius Caesar, Mahatma Gandhi and Alexander the Great helped contribute to the notion that great leaders are born and not made. In many examples, it seems as if the right man for the job seems to emerge almost magically to take control of a situation and lead a group of people into safety or success.

Historian Thomas Carlyle also had a major influence on this theory of leadership, at one point stating that, "The history of the world is but the biography of great men." According to Carlyle, effective leaders are those gifted with divine inspiration and the right characteristics.1  

Some of the earliest research on leadership looked at people who were already successful leaders. These individuals often included aristocratic rulers who achieved their position through birthright. Because people of a lesser social status had fewer opportunities to practice and achieve leadership roles, it contributed to the idea that leadership is an inherent ability.1  

Even today, people often describe prominent leaders as having the right qualities or personality for the position, implying that inherent characteristics are what make these people effective leaders.

Arguments Against the Great Man Theory of Leadership

Sociologist Herbert Spencer suggested that the leaders were products of the society in which they lived. In The Study of Sociology, Spencer wrote, "you must admit that the genesis of a great man depends on the long series of complex influences which has produced the race in which he appears, and the social state into which that race has slowly grown...Before he can remake his society, his society must make him."

One of the key problems with the great man theory of leadership is that not all people who possess the so-called natural leadership qualities actually become great leaders. If leadership was simply an inborn quality, then all people who possess the ​necessary traits would eventually find themselves in leadership roles. Research has instead found that leadership is a surprisingly complex subject and that numerous factors influence how successful a particular leader may or may not be. Characteristics of the group, the leader in power and the situation all interact to determine what type of leadership is needed and the effectiveness of this leadership.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the defining characteristics of the black upper class?
    9·1 answer
  • The British benefited from their mercantilist relationship with the American colonies primarily by ?!
    5·1 answer
  • An independent regulatory agency?
    9·1 answer
  • Whats the cabinet in the government system? (back then in the 1700s)
    10·1 answer
  • Why was night dangerous for khe sahn marines?
    13·1 answer
  • 2. What was the major difficulty with trade-in in ancient Greece?
    13·2 answers
  • Who made steel cheaper
    15·2 answers
  • How did WWI start and why when and where.
    15·1 answer
  • Type these out on the question
    8·2 answers
  • What was the name of the political party that took control of Russia after the second revolution in October 1917?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!