Yes, if the biospecimens are de-identified then the research is no longer considered human subjects research.
Option: C
Explanation:
It is in the norms that in same type of research, both the researchers need to maintain some ethics and rules that if they do same type of experiments and use same materials they should acknowledge the other or take permission before doing that.
Here researcher A is conducting research on emphysema using bio specimen from human subjects and researcher B is doing research on lung cancer. He also need bio specimen. But as it is mentioned in the consent form that specimen is de identified so no problem for researcher B in using same specimen like researcher A.
La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Desafortunadamente no se anexó la caricatura o algún otro tipo de referencia. Pero haciendo la investigación correspondiente, podemos decir que la caricatura es del personaje "Mafalda," del caricaturista Argentino Quino.
En la caricatura aparece la niña Guille gritando "Me duelen mis pies." Mafalda le responde "Pero claro, Guille, si te has puesto los zapatos al revés. Guille se mira los zapatos y grita "Me duele el orgullo."
En este caso, el Emisor es Guille, quien le transmite el mensaje a Mafalda. Por supuesto que Mafalda es el Receptor. El mensaje es el "me duelen los pies." Y el feedback o retroalimentación es cuando Mafalda le dice que trae los zapatos al revés.
The correct answer is release from proactive interference.
There are two phenomena that can explain forgetfulness: retroactive and proactive interference. The retroactive happens when we have information saved and, later, we receive new, more relevant information. In this case, the nervous system gives priority to the second. Proactive interference is the opposite phenomenon
Proactive interference occurs when old memories hinder the formation of new memories.
The Zimbardo experiment provides insight into Abu Ghraib prison scandal just as the Milgram experiment provides insight into My Lai massacre.+
<h3>
What is The Zimbardo Experiment?</h3>
In an effort to establish the validity of crowd theory, a type of group lunacy also known as deindividuation, psychologist Philip Zimbardo made a claim in 1971. He enlisted volunteers for an experiment and transformed a Stanford basement into a fake prison. Six would be on call, nine would be guards, and nine would be inmates. He took on the role of superintendent.
<h3>
What is The Milgram Experiment?</h3>
- The Milgram experiment sought to determine how far people would go to comply with authority figures' commands.
- An researcher instructed the participants to shock a different person with electric shocks that got stronger. The participants were unaware that the shocks were phony and that the person receiving them was an actor.
- Even though the person being shocked shouted in pain, the majority of volunteers still followed instructions.
<h3>
What is Milgram’s Legacy?</h3>
According to Milgram's interpretation of his studies, regular individuals are capable of doing the inconceivable under specific conditions. Although these applications are by no means commonly recognized or agreed upon, his study has been used to explain tragedies like the Holocaust and the Rwandan genocide.
<h3>
What is Stanford prison experiment?</h3>
The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) was created to investigate how participants' responses and behaviors changed throughout the course of a two-week simulation of a prison environment. Philip Zimbardo, a psychology professor at Stanford University, oversaw the research team that conducted the study in the summer of 1971.
Learn more about Stanford prison experiment:
brainly.com/question/5014785
#SPJ4
