All categories

3 years ago

What does Long say are the worst things that could happen to a family if wealth were shared? Check all that apply. PLEASE HELP.

History

2 answers:

Montano1993 [528]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

they would have enough money to feed and clothe the family, they would have a place to educate their children, they would have modern conveniences and some luxuries. (A,D,F)

Explanation:

To share our wealth by providing for every deserving family to have one third of the average wealth would mean that, at the worst, such a family could have a fairly comfortable home, an automobile, and a radio, with other reasonable home conveniences, and a place to educate their children. Through sharing the work, that is, by limiting the hours of toil so that all would share in what is made and produced in the land, every family would have enough coming in every year to feed, clothe, and provide a fair share of the luxuries of life to its members. Such is the result to a family, at the worst.

–Huey Long,

February 5, 1934

Leona [35]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

A D F

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Why was La Salle's expedition down the Mississippi River important to France? France claimed all of Canada. French claims extend

melamori03 [73]

B. Hope this helps sorry if I am a little late.

7 0

3 years ago

In what way did Sarah attempt to use her skills to lessen the conflict between her people and the government? A. She worked hard

kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

4 years ago

Reread paragraphs 1-4. The Indian termination policy and

aliina [53]

Answer:

Native American began identifying their group by its tribal name, such as Lakota.

Explanation:

Trust Me Its The Answer!!!!!!!

Hope This Helps!

And sorry I answered late.

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was responsible for the introduction of islam into the sahel region?

Anton [14]

Answer: <u>B. trade from the sahara</u>

Hope this helps!

7 0

3 years ago

When President George W. Bush established the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives in 2001 to allow religious organiz

Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

President Bush surely based his decision on previous jurisprudence by the Supreme Court. In 1899, the Court was asked to make an interpretation of the religion clause of the First Amendment. It was a case involving federal financing through a grant for the construction of a hospital that was going to be run by a Catholic order. The Court saw the hospital as a secular institution and charted as such by Congress, not a religious one, and in this way it avoided the constitutional issue.

Though uphelding the strict lay character of the state, the Court has not closed the door to all types of aid for certain activities by religious organizations.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago