Answer:
Instructions are listed below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Production of 12-ounce cans has a standard unit quantity of 4.4 ounces of aluminum per can. During April, 304,000 cans were produced using 1,243,000 ounces of aluminum. The actual cost of aluminum was $0.17 per ounce and the standard price was $0.07 per ounce.
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Direct material price variance= ( 0.07 - 0.17)*1,243,000= $124,300 unfavorable
Direct material quantity variance= (standard quantity - actual quantity)*standard price
Direct material quantity variance= (1,337,600 - 1,243,000)*0.07= $6,622 favorable
 
        
             
        
        
        
<span>the four-firm concentration ratio in the u.s. soda market in 2009 are as follows
Coca cola -42.7%
Pepsi - 30.8%
Dr.pepper snapple group - 15.3 %
Royal crown - 2.1 %
From the above data we can clearly find that Coke has an uphill battle—they have huge amounts of marketing muscle, financial resources.Against Coke and Pepsi, guerrilla warfare is the only thing that might work.</span>
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
D) Mercantilism
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Salcia's approach to international trade is being influenced by Mercantilism. This term refers to a policy that was created in order to maximize exports of a nation while at the same time minimizing the imports. This is what Salcia is trying to accomplish by not importing anything that they can make at home.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Ask your question <u>properly</u>
<u>and </u><u>also </u><u>follow </u><u>me </u>
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
 17.76%
Explanation:
The computation of the time-weighted return on your investment is given below
But before that we have to do the following calculations
Year 1 = ($46.50 - $42.50) + 2 ÷ ($42.50) × 100 = 14.12%
Year 2 = ($54.50 - $46.50) + 2 ÷ ($46.50) × 100 = 21.51%
Now the time weighted return is 
(1 + t)^2 = (1 + 14.12%) × (1 + 21.51%)
= 1.1412 × 1.2151
= √1.3867 - 1 
= 17.76%