The original price of the paper was $3.50
I hope this helps! let me know if you need help with anything else! I'd be happy to help you in anyway I can! :)
Lol k lol k lol k lol k it’s over 9,000
Answer: The first one. 2 to the 20th power over 3 to the 8th power
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
5x+2
Step-by-step explanation:
6x-x=5x and 5-3=2
so 5x+2 is the answer.
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.