Answer:
$102.876
Step-by-step explanation:
multiply 85.73 by 120% bc there is the price of the meal and 20% of the original price
Answer:
48.6 km/hr
Step-by-step explanation:
(135/10)×(18/5)
48.6 km/hr
Answer:
Let's define the cost of the cheaper game as X, and the cost of the pricer game as Y.
The total cost of both games is:
X + Y
We know that both games cost just above AED 80
Then:
X + Y > AED 80
From this, we want to prove that at least one of the games costed more than AED 40.
Now let's play with the possible prices of X, there are two possible cases:
X is larger than AED 40
X is equal to or smaller than AED 40.
If X is more than AED 40, then we have a game that costed more than AED 40.
If X is less than or equal to AED 40, then:
X ≥ AED 40
Now let's take the maximum value of X in this scenario, this is:
X = AED 40
Replacing this in the first inequality, we get:
X + Y > AED 80
Replacing the value of X we get:
AED 40 + Y > AED 80
Y > AED 80 - AED 40
Y > AED 40
So when X is equal or smaller than AED 40, the value of Y is larger than AED 40.
So we proven that in all the possible cases, at least one of the two games costs more than AED 40.
Answer:
16.5 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
The bicycle costs $240. Eva already has $42. She is making $12 per hour.
240 = 12x + 42
Solve for x to find out how many hours Eva needs to work to buy the bicycle.
240 = 12x + 42
240 - 42 = (12x + 42) - 42
198 = 12x
198/12 = (12x)/12
16.5 = x
Eva needs to work 16.5 hours to be able to buy the bikw.
637 is the answer because our value is 980 we all know the unknown value with x for the step above 980 and 100% and 65% is the result in a pair of a simple equations