I believe the answer is: Henry
<span>cognitive dissonance happens when an individual two contradictory behaviors at the same time.
</span>when a person have to undergone something that he doesn't like in order to get something that he desire as a reward (such as being humiliated to be accepted into a group), that person would most likely to maintain onto the ward because he does not want to revert back to the negative experience again.
If i were to create a law it would be a person shall not bear arms only police officers
My duty was to smuggle the pearls from my mom's drawer.
It's the practical-ish solution for individuals seeking monetary remedies too low in proportion to attorney fees, and requiring more legally binding enforcement measures than those provided by mediation/arbitration. The ish suffix indicates that it's not the democratized "people's court" that everyone thinks it is... We've found that it's not very useful for low-income, immigrant or shy folks which either don't feel confident enough, or are so ensnared by the legal system that they never think small claims court a viable solution for their problems.
<span>It also plays a great entertainment role, apparently, given the popularity of daytime shows such as that of the assertive Mrs. Judge Judy.</span>
