Answer:
c. cost-leadership strategy
Explanation:
Contour Autos tend to decrease the price of the product and that the quality served of the product is acceptable and not degraded. In this manner as against the normal industry the company supplies same quality goods at lower prices.
This decreases the cost for consumers and therefore, it is termed as Cost-Leadership strategy.
The Company tends to lead in the market through lower cost of goods supplied with the same quality.
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
At the end of a common agreement, there is no consequence for any of the parties, since it is their will to end the contract that they previously agreed to sign
Termination of the lease by the lessor.
The lessor may unilaterally terminate the lease under the conditions established by law, paying any compensation that may arise.
The law expressly establishes when and why the lease can be terminated by the lessor, and only in those cases can the contract be terminated without there being room for the payment of a penal clause or non-compliance, if any, since in those cases the law in particular established how and why to terminate the contract, and set the penalties to which there is room.
Answer:
The first amendment involves the freedom off free scheech and religion. Meaning that a person can not criticize or not display a person's religion based on your own beliefs or beliefs of others.
Explanation:
Reference possibilities could be
1. http:/guides.library.harvard .edu/
2. Your state website ie Maine.gov mass.gov
3. USA.gov is the federal law
4. Loc.gov is the library of congress
5. 6. Supremecourtus.gov and supremecourts
Gov/opinions for us Supreme Court and recent opinions
7. Law.cornell.edu/citation for legal citations for legal arguments if needed as well as taking the citation out of the address bar to use for finding the law online
8. Http.thelawdictionary.org for legal terms or the black law dictionary
Be cautious of commercial websites some that are good and can give information that is not completely accurate.
C1. Findlaw.com
C2. Lexisone.com for federal and state cases and statutes
Both are used for general information.
Good luck.
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
