Match the following items.

If the Ricardian equivalence theorem LOADING... is not relevant, then an income-tax-rate cut A. will result in a multiple time

LenKa [72]

Answer:

The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short run; however, a tax-rate reduction will increase the automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.

Explanation:

Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.

This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.

If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.

The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.

6 0

3 years ago

The difference between the minimum price at which a producer is willing and able to sell a unit of a good or service and the pri

kap26 [50]

Answer:

Seller Surplus

Explanation:

In business terms, there is a difference in the expected value what a seller expects to receive from the products it sells and from the amount it actually earns.

The cost of the product not only involves the monetary cost but it also involves the cost in terms of efforts involved to produce an article.

When a seller puts a product in the market, then he tries to have it a market value more than its cost. When such market value is realised then the difference in cost and market value is surplus for the supplier or producer.

But in cases where the consumer is efficient enough to bargain such product and only pays an amount which is less than the cost, then there arises seller deficit, which is represented as a negative seller surplus.

4 0

3 years ago

The following bond was quoted in The Wall Street Journal:

lisov135 [29]

If Five bonds were purchased yesterday, and 5 bonds were purchased today. How much more that the 5 bonds cost today is: $75.

<h3>Cost of bonds today</h3>

Using this formula

Bond Yield =Total annual interest of bond / Total current cost of bond at closing

First step is to calculate the Closing bonds

Closing bonds=(96.875 x 10)× 5 bonds

Closing bonds= $968.75 × 5 bonds

Closing bonds= $4,843.75

Second step is to calculate the Next day cost of bonds

Next day cost of bonds=[(96.875 + 1.50) x 10]× 5 bonds

Next day cost of bonds = $983.75 × 5 bonds

Next day cost of bonds= $4,918.75

Third step is to calculate the Cost of bonds today

Cost of bonds today=$4,918.75 - $4,843.75

Cost of bonds today = $75

Therefore If Five bonds were purchased yesterday, and 5 bonds were purchased today. How much more that the 5 bonds cost today is: $75.

Learn more about cost of bonds today here:brainly.com/question/25596583

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago

Prior to the early twentieth century, a worker who was injured on the job could collect damages only by suing his employer. To

soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Wages would fall due to an increase in labor costs.

When the workers compensation laws were not there, the employers only had to worry about one labor cost, that of paying their employees. With the introduction of worker's compensation, they then had to get insurance for their employees as well.

This led to an increase in the costs of labor which meant an increase in production costs and a decrease in profitability. To compensate for this, the employers cut wages in order to be able to pay for both the insurance and wages and still pay the same general amounts they were paying as wages such that their production costs don't rise significantly.

3 0

3 years ago

On May 1, 2015, Herron Corp. issued $600,000, 9%, 5-year bonds at face value. The bonds were dated May 1, 2015, and pay interest

vivado [14]

Herron Corp

A. Journal entry

Dr Cash 600,000

Cr Bonds Payable 600,000

B. Adjusting entries as at Dec 31, 2015

Dr Interest Expense 9,000

Cr Interest Payable ($600,000 x 9% x 2/12) 9,000

C. Balance sheet as at December 31, 2015

Current liabilities

Interest Payable 9,000

Long term Liabilities

Bonds Payable 600,000

D. Journal entry as at May 1, 2016

Dr Interest Expense ($600,000 x 9% x 4/12) 18,000

Dr Interest Payable 9,000

Cr Cash 27,000

(e) Journal entry Nov 1, 2016

Dr Interest Expense 27,000

Cr Cash ($600,000 x 9% x 1/12) 27,000

F. Bonds at 102 on Nov 1,2016

Dr Bonds Payable 600,000

Dr Loss on Bond Redemption 12,000

Cr Cash ($600,000 x 1.02) 612,000

4 0

3 years ago