Territorial expansion remained popular with the U.S. public, as did the idea of spreading republican government. Many pro-slavery Southerners sought to expand southwards, allowing for more territory where slavery could continue to grow and expand.
Human Sacrifices is the act of killing one or more humans, usually as an offering to a deity, as part of a ritual. Human sacrifice has been practiced in various cultures throughout history.
I mean.
They're both in history and ''practiced''.
Though a connection, no, Territorial expansion went along with slavery. The act of killing another human being is not very humane nor a connection. Slavery deals with principles of property law are applied to them, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Human Sacrifices deal with people who have really no choice and are dead either way, victims were typically ritually killed in a manner that was supposed to please or appease gods, spirits or the deceased. Slavery doesn't deal with death. So, no.
Answer: if this is wrong let me know
Explanation:
According to Robert Calhoon, between 40 and 45 percent of the white population in the Thirteen Colonies supported the Patriots' cause, between 15 and 20 percent supported the Loyalists, and the remainder were neutral or kept a low profile.
The "war on terrorism" is a HYBRID. ... Their violence is a legitimate action according to the war model. Problem: the U.S. has claimed that we can punish these enemies for plotting to harm us. In contrast, the LAW model allows us to punish someone, but if it's a "war," we are violating their rights in doing so. hope this helps
Answer:
Adaption to the land and its resources
Explanation:
migrants and their descendants pushed south and east, adapting as they went.
Answer:
Trying to capture moscow
Not Crushing the British at Dunkirk
Explanation:
Not Crushing the British at Dunkirk
Trying to capture moscow
