<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be that the North had better industrial capabilities, which allowed them to produce more war materials. </span></span>
Answer:
D. Confederal
Explanation:
It can't be federal because it is the opposite. The federal government doesn't get involved that much in what separate states do with themselves. Presidential is also not the answer because the president doesn't get to control states. It is not Unitary because it still answers to some parts of the federal government. It is a confederal government.
It was the abolition of serfdom and the establishment of a constitutional monarchy. Those involve in the revolt were also against the crowning of Nicholas I and this later led to a confrontation between the rebels and loyal troops. The revolt was suppressed and many were arrested. Though it failed it helped start the movements for revolution in Russia.
Answer:
The most straightforward theory for Western Rome’s collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces. Rome had tangled with Germanic tribes for centuries, but by the 300s “barbarian” groups like the Goths had encroached beyond the Empire’s borders. The Romans weathered a Germanic uprising in the late fourth century, but in 410 the Visigoth King Alaric successfully sacked the city of Rome. The Empire spent the next several decades under constant threat before “the Eternal City” was raided again in 455, this time by the Vandals. Finally, in 476, the Germanic leader Odoacer staged a revolt and deposed the Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From then on, no Roman emperor would ever again rule from a post in Italy, leading many to cite 476 as the year the Western Empire suffered its deathblow.
Explanation:
