Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
We have agreed to use money when making transactions. Money provides a device for identifying and communicating value of goods and services.
Question: Money is a "medium of exchange," meaning
Answer: C) it can be used to purchase goods and services.
The congress of vienna led to revolts in France because : Many people did not want an aboslute monarchy
Absolute monarchy gave too much power to the king to the point where He can use his power to abuse the people however he pleased
hope this helps
<span>Pennsylvania was founded as a Church of England colony, unlike Massachusetts.
hoped this helped
=)
</span>
