Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The graph of y=|x-k|+h is the graph of y=|x| shifted k units to the right and h units up. To reflect the equation across the x-axis (flip it upside down), the equation changes to 
.
Hope this helps!
<h3>
Answer: No, they are not similar.</h3>
Technically, we don't have enough info so it could go either way.
==========================================================
Explanation:
We can see that the sides are proportional to each other, but we don't know anything about the angles. We need to know if the angles are the same. If they are, then the hexagons are similar. If the angles are different, then the figures are not similar.
Right now we simply don't have enough info. So they could be similar, or they may not be. The best answer (in my opinion) is "not enough info". However, your teacher likely wants you to pick one side or the other. We can't pick "similar" so it's best to go with "not similar" until more info comes along the way.
Answer:
$1456.25
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
P= $1,250
t= 3 years
r=5.5%
The compound interest expression is given as
A= P(1+r)^t
substitute
A= 1250(1+0.055*3)
A= 1250(1+ 0.165)
A= 1250(1.165)
A= 1456.25
Hence the amount after 3 years is $1456.25
F=ir^t
139=134r^10
139/134=r^10
r=(139/134)^(1/10) then:
f=134(139/134)^(t/10) so in 2014, t=24 so
f=134(139/134)^(2.4)
f≈146 million (to nearest million)
Some will say that you have to use the exponential function, but it really gives you the same answer...even for continuous compounding :)...
A=Pe^(kt)
139=134e^(10k)
139/134=e^(10k)
ln(139/134)=10k
k=ln(139/134)/10 so
A=134e^(t*ln(139/134)/10) when t=24
A=134e^(2.4*ln(139/134))
A≈146 million (to nearest million)
The only real reason or advantage to using A=Pe^(kt) is when you start getting into differential equations...
Answer:
If it is a 6 sided dice, then the probability will be roughly a 1 in 12 chance
Step-by-step explanation:
I think, not entirely sure, sorry if it is wrong
