Answer:
The answer is: A
Explanation:
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1, is one of a handful of provisions in the original Constitution related to slavery, though it does not use the word “slave.” This Clause prohibited the federal government from limiting the importation of “persons” (understood at the time to mean primarily enslaved African persons) where the existing state governments saw fit to allow it, until some twenty years after the Constitution took effect. It was a compromise between Southern states, where slavery was pivotal to the economy, and states where the abolition of slavery had been accomplished or was contemplated.
The Franchise Bill, which would have extended citizenship to all Italians. The plebs didn't want to share the benefits of citizenship. This led to the Social War of the 90s.
Some southerners threatened to secede over California's application for statehood during the middle of the 19th century because California would enter the US as a free state.
This means the state would not have slavery. Along with this, it would mean that there would be more representatives in Congress (aka the House of Representatives and the Senate) that are free states than slave states. This situation puts the southerners at risk, as the free states could make laws that would get rid of the institution of slavery. At this time, almost the entire south's economy depended on slavery.
Do you have any answer choices
Explanation:
In the question above, the white line that downslope indicates the demand
Since we are given the quantity as 24 while the price is $5
The downslope of the white line says that the quantity of goods demanded is high and the price of that commodity will decrease and vice versa ( That's the law of demand)
The black slope is upward indicating the supply
where the price is $5 and the quantity supplied is 24
Therefore the upward slope indicates that the higher the price, the higher the quantity of goods that are being supplied, and vice versa ( That's the law of supply )
