1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
3 years ago
12

Why did messianic belief Jesus was largely consistent with Jewish apocalyptic nationalism?

History
1 answer:
Dafna11 [192]3 years ago
5 0
Because jesus is real religion and jews is based on fiction
You might be interested in
Why do historians consider the greatest achievement of the Byzantine Empire to be the preservation of Greek and Roman cultures?
ikadub [295]
Historians consider the greatest achievement of the Byzantine Empire to be the preservation of Greek and Roman cultures Because Greek and Roman literature, arts, mathematics, engineering, etc. has been preserved by the Byzantine Empire, people were able to have access to the information and ideas that the Greeks and Romans produced which helps modern mathematicians and engineers to this day.
I hope it helped

7 0
4 years ago
Which ruler united upper and lower egypt
levacccp [35]
Menes united upper and lower Egypt by sending an army down the Nile and defeated the king of lower Eygpt
3 0
4 years ago
Cause & Effect: What was the main event described
muminat

Answer:

post the article and give more points, then people will answer! :)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which words best describe king leopold ii’s actions in central africa?
serg [7]

Answer:

cruel, ruthless, genocidal

Explanation:

Leopold II, who reigned in Belgium between 1865 and 1909, sought to turn his small country into an imperial power for which he led efforts to develop the Congo River basin.

Arguing his desire to bring the benefits of Christianity, Western civilization and commerce to African natives, the monarch convinced the Eurasian powers to allow him to take control of that vast region through an organization he called the International African Association and that In 1885 he transformed into the Free State of Congo.

This private institution was not linked to the Belgian state but depended directly on the monarch, who presented himself as his "owner." It was the only private colony in the world.

But behind the philanthropic discourse of Leopold II there was a great interest in seizing the great wealth of the territory.

First, of ivory, which was immensely appreciated at the time.

Thus arose most of the wealth obtained by the monarch during the first years of the Free State of Congo.

Gradually, interest in ivory was displaced by rubber fever, when in the 1890s its use skyrocketed to produce bicycle and car wheels.

There are also many stories about the crudeness with which this material was exploited in the territories controlled by Leopold II.

He turned his 'Free State of the Congo' into a massive labor camp, made a fortune for himself by collecting rubber and contributed greatly to the death of perhaps 10 million innocents.

In 1998, the American historian Adam Hochschild published a book in which Leopold II was designated as responsible for a kind of African holocaust, which would exceed the number of dead Jews by Nazi Germany in number of victims.

What there is a coincidence among scholars was in the brutal methods used by the representatives of Leopold II to force the native population to exploit the rubber.

The method to force Congolese to work was as follows: they entered a village by force, took women and girls hostage and ordered men to enter the jungle to collect a certain quota of rubber.

While the men fulfilled the task imposed to save their wives and daughters, they starved or were subjected to sexual abuse.

In addition, those who were not able to complete the quota that had been imposed on them were threatened with the amputation of one of their hands or those of one of their children.

Is it enough to qualify Leopold II as a genocidal?

5 0
3 years ago
Do you think that being natural born citizen should still be a requirement for being president
aivan3 [116]

Answer:

I believe anyone in the U.S.A should be able to run for president because it doesn't matter where you were born it matters what you offering in order to become president and if you do end up president if you are going to keep your word and do what you told the people you were going to do.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Republican Presidents in the 1920s generally favored
    11·1 answer
  • I need to write a speech pretending I'm an American politician arguing for and against the return of isolationism, I need help s
    14·1 answer
  • Which nation has a command economy?<br><br> Cuba<br> Norway<br> South Korea<br> the United States
    5·2 answers
  • The principle that government can only do what its people give it the authority to do is called
    5·2 answers
  • Who determines the qualifications of members of Congress?
    13·2 answers
  • The first state to have al African Americans regiment was?
    13·2 answers
  • What is nationalism?
    13·1 answer
  • Why does Washington think thousands of young people have attended Tuskeegee institute since it opened they wanted to improve the
    9·1 answer
  • What are two of the vivid details that Jean-Roch
    12·1 answer
  • Describe compression and rupture. Rock stresses
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!