Answer:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $6,270 favorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard= Direct labor 0.4 hours $ 11.00 per hour
Actual output 2,600 units
Actual direct labor-hours 470 hours
To calculate the direct labor efficiency variance, we need to use the following formula:
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (Standard Quantity - Actual Quantity)*standard rate
Standard quantity= 0.4*2,600= 1,040
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= (1,040 - 470)*11
Direct labor time (efficiency) variance= $6,270 favorable
Answer:
$101,500
Explanation:
Net Sales $2,030,000
Allowance for uncollectible Accounts ($2,030,000*5%)=$101,500
The amount of uncollectible accounts to be reported in income statement shall be $101,500
Answer:
TOTAL 258,000
TOTAL 258,000
Explanation:
Calculation to reconcile the number of physical units Using the FIFO method
PHYSICAL UNITS
Beginning Inventory 74,000
Units Started 184,000
TOTAL 258,000
PHYSICAL UNITS
Units Completed 164,000
(258,000-94,000)
Ending Inventory 94,000
TOTAL 258,000
Therefore Using the FIFO method to reconcile the number of physical units will give us 258,000 and 258,000
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the incremental net income is shown below:
<u>Particulars Sell Process Further Incremental Net income
</u>
Sales $20,000.00 $50,000.00 $30,000.00
(10,000 units × $2) (10,000 × $5)
Less:
Additional
Processing cost $18,000.00 $18,000.00
Total $20,000.00 $32,000.00 $12,000.00
Answer:
D. $5,000
Explanation:
This deadweight in a lot of cases are seen to occur especially when demand and supply are not in equilibrium and in and in the above scenario, it is pegged at $5000. Therefore sometimes consumers experience shortages, and producers earn but they'd otherwise.
Taxes are also seen in the creation of deadweight loss because they prevent people from engaging in purchases they'd otherwise make because the ultimate price of the merchandise is above the equilibrium value. If taxes on an item rise, the burden is commonly split between the producer and therefore the consumer, resulting in the producer receiving less cash in on the item and therefore the customer paying the next price.
