Answer:
b. Decrease his inputs
Explanation:
The Equity Theory explains the influence that the perception of fair treatment has on the motivation of individuals. Or, from another point of view, in its demotivation.
People tend to compare ourselves to others. With other people's situations, inside and outside work. Thus, we form a perception about what is fair or unfair.
If the result of the comparison is understood as fair, people are more likely to feel motivated. On the contrary, when they perceive that they are treated unfairly, tension and demotivation appear.
In short, when compared to others, people want to be treated fairly for their contributions to the organization. And beliefs regarding what is fair and unfair can affect their motivation, attitudes and, therefore, their behaviors at work.
Answer:
The correct answers are:
1) "B": a common resource.
2) "A": excludable and rival.
Explanation:
1) A common resource is one that provides tangible benefits. This is the type of resource that can be used by several people at the same time without excluding the availability for its use to others. If they are not owned by anyone they take the name of open-access resources.
2) A good is excludable and rival if someone can prevent the use of it and when its use necessarily implies others not using it. Under this category fall all private resources since their ownership belongs to a certain number of people only if not only one.
Answer:
The deposit of $178,000 by Mr. Rho appears under Liabilities of Waterfield Bank as shown in the attached photo.
Explanation:
Note: See the attached photo for the T-account Illustration for Waterfield Bank after this transaction has occurred.
The the proceeds of the home sale deposited by Mr. Rho into his checking account at Waterfield Bank is liability to Waterfield Bank. Therefore, the deposit of $178,000 by Mr. Rho appears under Liabilities of Waterfield Bank as shown in the attached photo.
Answer:
d. With trade, Brazil should specialize in sugar cane and China in iPods.
Explanation:
As from the given situation it can be seen that Brazil has an absolute advantage while producing the sugarcane as it takes one unit of labor for generating one unit of sugarcane
On the other hand, china has an absolute advantage for generating an ipod as it takes four unit of labor to generate one ipod
Therefore the option d is correct
The EOQ is 980 units and should reduce the fixed ordering cost to an amount of $62.50.
<u>Explanation:</u>
a)
Annual demand=Qty per mth multiply with 12 = 1000 multiply with 12 =12000
Annual demand in USD, A= 12000 multiply with USD 100 (cost of each part) = USD 1200000
Preparation cost, P= 4 hrs changeover time multiply with USD 250 per hr = USD 1000
Annual holding cost, I = 25% = 0.25
EOQ in USD= Root over (2 multiply with A multiply with P divide by I ) = USD 9.79 multiply with 10000 = USD 98000
EOQ in nos. = USD 98000 divide by USD 100 (cos of each part) = 980 units
b) Q = 980 divide by 4 = 245
In this case, annual carryring cost, C = EOQ 980 by 4 multiply with 0.5 multiply with Unit cost USD 100 multiply with 0.25 = USD 3062.50
Annual demand, D = 1000 per month multiply with 12 = 12000
Ordering cost = C multiply with 245 / D = USD 62.50
