Answer:
Option C: substitution effect will tend to reduce the demand for labor
Explanation:
Capital is simply anything man made that is used in the production of goods and service. It is that which is used by man to start any business venture or produce goods and services e.g. money(currency),machinery, buildings, stock etc. Labor is mans effort put into work.
Since capital is readily substitutable for labor and when the price of capital falls. We can say that the substitution effect will tend to reduce the demand for labor. If also capital and labor are used in rigidly fixed proportions and the price of capital falls, it can be concluded the substitution and output effects will work.
Given:
marginal factor cost of 75 per day after hiring 2nd worker.
market wage is now 62.50 per day for both workers.
62.50 x 2 workers = 125
125 - 75 marginal factor cost = 50
The first employee earns 50 per day when she worked alone.
Answer:
Annual financial disadvantage = $ (669,600)
Explanation:
Relevant cost are future incremental cash costs that arise as a direct consequence of a decision.
The relevant costs of this decision to disconnected includes the following:
- The variable cost of making the product = $19 per unit
- Sales revenue at a price of $25
- Savings in avoidable fixed costs (102,000-72,000) = 30,000
Annual financial advantage
$
Lost contribution $(25-19)× 4,300 units = (85,800)
Saving in fixed cost = <u> 30,000</u>
M<em>onthly net loss </em><em><u> 55,800</u></em>
Annual financial disadvantage
Monthly net loss × 12 months
= (55,800) × 12
= $ (669,600)
Yes. Once someone is in a difficult financial situation, they may have to give up some wants and desires in place of things they need. If money is tight, they should rather use what money they have to pay pills and buy food, and not purchase items they want like toys or videogames. When faced with a bad financial situation, an individual is forced to separate what they believe is a want and a need, and choose between the two.
Full question:
In some states and localities, scalping is against the law although enforcement is spotty
A. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a weakly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets.
B. Using supply/demand analysis and words, demonstrate what a strongly enforced antiscalping law would likely do to the price of tickets
Answer and Explanation:
A. For the first scenario, a weakly enforced antiscalping law would still allow the resale of tickets as it is not enforced properly. Therefore it's effect on price would remain as though there were no laws restricting scalping( scalping: price increase created by artificial shortage and bulk resale of tickets) . See the attached diagram for the supply and demand curve and price increase as a result of a weak antiscalping law
B. For the second scenario, scalping has no effect on price as antiscalping laws are strong and therefore there is no scalping. Price remains the same and does not change.
In diagram A for first scenario price increases from p1 to p2 and quantity decreases from q1 to q2 to indicate increase in price and quantity decrease for shortage respectively. This shows the effect of scalping on the market with weak antiscalping laws
In diagram B, price and quantity remain the same to show strong antiscalping laws
