The answer to the first unknown in the problem is "A phobia" while in the second unknown in the problem is the "condition emotional response". Such as a phobia is an exaggerated, irrational fear of an object or a situation which may sometimes be thought of as a condition emotional response.
Answer:
Posconvential morality.
Explanation:
It is postconventional morality because at this point, the man understands the differenes between right and wrong. However, he is using his own set of morals to drive his actions, which is essentially what postconvential morality is all about. In his eyes, he sees that the government is partaking in unethical actions. Furthermore, he states that "Yes ,I did steal the documents, and I am willing to go to jail for it." This backs up the fact that he comprehends the difference bewteen right and wrong, but still chooses to go through with the act anyways because it is what he believes to be right. Thus, tying his entire feat back into the ideology of postconventional morality.
Explanation:
Without having any choices, I can post all of the things that the broker-agent must do prior to renewing their license. If a person is a Property & Casualty Broker-Agent and is also licensed as a Life-Only or Accident & Health agent they must follow the correct steps to get their license renewed.
They must complete, at minimum, 24 hours of instruction held by a place that has been approved by the Commissioner of the license they seek to renew. During this instruction, there must a total of 3 hours of ethics training. This must be done prior to the license being renewed, if this is not completed, the license will not be renewed.
These license for this type of broker-agent must be renewed every 2 years. If the agent-broker chooses, they can take more instruction courses including seminars and this can be rolled over to the next years training when it is time for the renewal again.
Learn more about health care agents at brainly.com/question/13157118
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
b) inductive-strong
Explanation:
An inductive argument is commonly known as a type of argument in which the premises give authentic points that support the conclusion made by the jury. In addition, if an inductive argument is said to be inductive and strong if the argument is genuinely true and definitely it is not likely that the conclusions made are false.
