1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Law Incorporation [45]
3 years ago
14

One of Sam Houston’s biggest goals and challenges in his second term as president of Texas was to balance the Republic’s budget.

Houston drastically reduced spending in several areas of the military. Do you think this was a wise decision or not? How else could Sam Houston have balanced the budget of Texas at the time?
History
2 answers:
Alik [6]3 years ago
7 0

Sam Houston should have not reduced spending in the military because the military needed more money at the time and he could balance out the budget by reducing the pay of schools

valentinak56 [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

we are not the only ones who are willing and willing and to

Explanation:

so I was doing a good job at 7 am and the whole thing was in

You might be interested in
explain the differences between the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. how were these differences resolved
Delicious77 [7]
Both plans involved how the new Constitution would define representation in Congress. The Virginia Plan proposed that the number of delegates be based upon population, thus favoring larger states with more people. The New Jersey Plan proposed that each state have an equal number of delegates, thus favoring smaller states with fewer people. 

Under the Virginia Plan, a state like Virginia would have had a much greater say in Congress than smaller New Jersey since Virginia had a larger population. Under the New Jersey Plan, New Jerseyans would have had a disproportionate say relative to Virginians. Consider this, if each state had two delegates (under the NJ Plan) let's say New Jersey had 500,000 people and Virginia had 1,000,000 (not the real numbers). With two delegates, New Jersey would have had 1 say in Congress per 250,000 voters while Virginia would have had 1 say in Congress per 500,000 voters. 

These differences were resolved by creating a bicameral legislature. Today, the House of Representatives is a remnant of the Virginia Plan. States with larger populations have more seats in the House than those with smaller populations. For example, California has far more Representatives than Wyoming meaning California has a much greater say in the House. The Senate, on the other hand, is a remnant of the New Jersey Plan. Each state has two Senators regardless of population, which means each state has an equal say. Again, California has two Senators and Wyoming has two Senators despite the fact that California is much larger than Wyoming - this gives Wyoming a much greater say per voters than California. No law can pass through Congress without approval from both chambers of Congress, which means that smaller states are not overpowered, while larger states still have the ability to set the agenda. 
6 0
3 years ago
If the president should die or become unable to fulfill his role, what would be the correct order of those listed below in
ahrayia [7]

Answer:

Secretary of the Treasury, Secretary of Defense, Attorney General

Out of those three that is what the answer would be. But if you were to need the whole line it would be:

1. Vice President 2. Speaker of the House of Representatives 3. President Pro Tempore of the Senate 4. Secretary of State 5. Secretary of the Treasury 6. Secretary of Defense 7. Attorney General 8. Secretary of the Interior 9. Secretary of Agriculture 10. Secretary of Commerce 11. Secretary of Labor 12. Secretary of Health and Human Services 13. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development 14. Secretary of Transportation 15. Secretary of Energy 16. Secretary of Education 17. Secretary of Veterans Affairs 18. Secretary of Homeland Security

6 0
4 years ago
Why were the Mongol armies so successful at conquest despite their relatively small size?
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

A combination of training, tactics, discipline, intelligence and constantly adapting new tactics gave the Mongol army its savage edge against the slower, heavier armies of the times. The Mongols lost very few battles, and they usually returned to fight again another day, winning the second time around.

Found this on google, sorry if this isn't what you wanted. Have a great day/night and stay safe.

8 0
3 years ago
The area settled by the Greeks
Nuetrik [128]
I'm pretty sure syracuse was but I'm not sure.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is a valid characteristic of politics and government in the period following the Civil War?
gogolik [260]

It was common for people to run for public office in order to get rich.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • I need a catchy fake newspaper name! not a title but the actual name of the newspaper company! please have it something to do wi
    8·2 answers
  • Supply-side theorists believed that tax cuts would lead to ______.
    11·2 answers
  • The Cultural Revolution ended by the early 1970s. In which two ways did it cause devastation in China?
    6·2 answers
  • Analyze one way in which non-european civilization influenced post medieval europe. be sure to use a specific non-european civil
    12·1 answer
  • What body of water would you have to cross to travel from Ottoman Empire to Eastern Europe ?
    7·1 answer
  • The __ were early farmers.
    12·2 answers
  • Why were african salves brought to the americas
    10·1 answer
  • In which industry did capitalism undermine guilds with a domestic system?
    8·1 answer
  • Answer the following question regarding Imperialism in East Asia:
    13·1 answer
  • What did Frederick Douglass and John Brown think of Harriet Tubman? 1. They thought she was a little too little to do any good o
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!