Answer:
$ 25
Explanation:
As per the description, the exact amount that is being contributed from the corn bushel to the Gross Domestic Product would be $ 25. The price at which the farmer sold it to the supermarket would not be included in the GDP because it would be considered as an intermediary good because the good purchased for the resale purpose is not included in GDP as it leads to double-counting. Thus, <u>only the price of the final good i.e. $ 25 would be included in GDP as it will now be used for final consumption by the customers</u>.
Answer:
The correct answer is all of the above
Explanation:
Scrap or the rework costs are the costs which is incurred in order to repair the items that are defective. And the decision to rework or scrap an item or product, ground on the benefits or advantage of the incremental costs.
If the reworked units generate or yield greater advantage or benefit rather than the selling them as scrap, then the decision to rework will be considered.
And if the decision of rework is taken, then the management should consider the incremental costs, revenue or profit from selling the defective units as scarp and the lost profit on selling and making the new units while the rework is performed.
Answer:
Explanation:
4 worries about Bold and Best (BB) are:
- Demand for BB may fall in the next few years, as customers are now less interested in purchasing BB or there is another substitute product for BB which is available in the market.
- Input costs/Production cost for BB may rise in the next few years, may be because of shortage of raw materials.
- The decline in BB sales may affect Baldwin's profitability as a whole because BB's revenue is currently the largest portion of the total revenue.
- Real purchasing power of customers fall because of a rise in expected inflation in the economy, which will lead to a fall in sales of BB.
Answer:
c. No; the facts of this situation do not provide reasonable grounds for a stop and search. Any attempt to do so by store security could result in a claim of false imprisonment.
Explanation:
According to the situation described in the question above, store security has no right to stop and search for Jeff. Therefore, the letter c is the most correct answer to this question.
Jeff's actions in the store do not provide sufficient reasons for there to be any kind of stop and research, as the facts in the situation do not provide enough information about an illegal act, so if store security forces a situation there could be legal damage to the store .
Therefore, it is essential that stores adopt a theft prevention strategy, with an effective security system and a team prepared to carry out correct approaches.
