All categories

3 years ago

For brainliest please help!

Mathematics

1 answer:

Advocard [28]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

negative multiples of 3 less than -3

Step-by-step explanation:

if m <9, then

m ={8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,....,..........}

And |6m-55|

So is said that,

when, m= 8

6(8)-55=-6

when, m=7

6(7)-54=-12

when, m = 6

6(6)-54=-18

Since the trend is negative multiples of 3 less than -3

this is my answer

You might be interested in

What is the answer??<br> I NEED 2 KNOW!! =~=

alexdok [17]

A because the square is in the (10) place and the circle is in the (1) place and 10 is 10 times bigger than 1

4 0

3 years ago

A group of friends wants to go to the amusement park. they have no more than $405 to spend on parking and admission. parking is

lakkis [162]

$20+38.50x \leq 405$

4 0

1 year ago

A geodesic dome has a radius of 27 feet. Which value is closest to the volume of the dome? Use 3.14 for π.

pantera1 [17]

We know, Volume of a Sphere = 4/3 πr³
v = 4/3 * 3.14 * 27³
v = 4/3 * 3.14 * 19,683
v = 82406.16 feet³

In short, Your Answer would be Option B

Hope this helps!

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

There were 935 offenses in 2000 and 2448 offenses in 2019. What is the percentage increase?

Artist 52 [7]

Answer:

Approximately 262%

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the percentage increase divide the new amount of offenses by the old amount of offenses:

2448/935 = 2.618

2.618 rounds to 2.62. Convert 2.62 into a percentage: 262%

The percentage increase between the amount of offenses in 2000 and the amount of offenses in 2019 is approximately 262%.

6 0

3 years ago

A resident of Bayport claims to the City Council that the proportion of Westside residents

Kazeer [188]

Answer:

The test statistics is $z = -1.56$

The p-value is $p-value = 0.05938$

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told

The West side sample size is $n_1 = 578$

The number of residents on the West side with income below poverty level is $k = 76$

The East side sample size $n_2=688$

The number of residents on the East side with income below poverty level is $u = 112$

The null hypothesis is $H_o : p_1 = p_2$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a : p_1 < p_2$

Generally the sample proportion of West side is

$\^{p} _1 = \frac{k}{n_1}$

=> $\^{p} _1 = \frac{76}{578}$

=> $\^{p} _1 = 0.1315$

Generally the sample proportion of West side is

$\^{p} _2 = \frac{u}{n_2}$

=> $\^{p} _2 = \frac{112}{688}$

=> $\^{p} _2 = 0.1628$

Generally the pooled sample proportion is mathematically represented as

$p = \frac{k + u}{ n_1 + n_2 }$

=> $p = \frac{76 + 112}{ 578 + 688 }$

=> $p =0.1485$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

$z = \frac{\^ {p}_1 - \^{p}_2}{\sqrt{p(1- p) [\frac{1}{n_1 } + \frac{1}{n_2} ]} }$

=> $z = \frac{ 0.1315 - 0.1628 }{\sqrt{0.1485(1-0.1485) [\frac{1}{578} + \frac{1}{688} ]} }$

=> $z = -1.56$

Generally the p-value is mathematically represented as

$p-value = P(z < -1.56 )$

From z-table

$P(z < -1.56 ) = 0.05938$

$p-value = 0.05938$

3 0

3 years ago