1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AVprozaik [17]
3 years ago
12

Please help, hard question

Mathematics
1 answer:
alukav5142 [94]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

6, 24, 96, 384

Step-by-step explanation:

start with 6 and multiply each successive term by 4

You might be interested in
Will make you brainliest!!! If correct!!
Virty [35]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

y = - \frac{1}{4} x + 3 ( equation of line t )

y - (- 2) = - \frac{1}{4} [ x - (- 2)] ⇒ y = - \frac{1}{4} x - \frac{5}{2} ( equation of line u )

5 0
3 years ago
HELP HELP HELP HELP
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

62.8cubic units

Step-by-step explanation:

volume of a cylinder isπ×radius×radius×height.hope it helps.

4 0
3 years ago
What is 4.72 in expanded form
scoray [572]
In expanded form it is 4 + 0.7 + 0.02
5 0
4 years ago
Proportional relationships, please answer all of the parts! Thank you!
Natalka [10]

Answer:

a. No (see below)

b. (see below)

c. Johnny

d. Johnny = $12.50 / hour      Doug = $9.16... / hour

e. Doug: extend the table to show how much he gets paid for 1 hour of work (the unit rate)

Johnny: already on the graph

Step-by-step explanation:

a. No. This is because a proportional relationship would have a certain ratio between payment and the amount of time spent working, which would not change. However, if Doug's neighbour pays him $55 for 6 hours, it's likely that this is not a proportional relationship, or we would be able to divide $55 by the 6 hours Doug spent working.

b. Even though above I said that it's probably not a proportional relationship, if it were, we would have to divide everything equally. I'm guessing the table should look like this:

                            Doug

       Time (hr)                      Earnings ($)

          4                                  $36.66...

          5                                  $45.8333...

          6                                  $55

          7                                  $64.4666....

          8                                  $73.333...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 4 hours:

4/6 x $55 = 2/3 x $55 = $36.66... (so definitely not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 5 hours:

5/6 x $55 = $45.8333.... (more evidence that this is not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 7 hours (we already got 6 hours):

7/6 x $55 = $64.4666...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 8 hours:

8/6 x $55 = $73.33... (we could double the 4 hour payment, but this is probably more accurate)

c. Johnny is getting paid more. If we look at how much Doug gets for 6 hours, it's $55. If we look out at how much Johnny gets for 6 hours, it's $75. (If we do the same with the other amounts of time, it's the same.

4 hours: D = $36.67 vs J = $50

5 hours: D = $45.83 VS J = $60

etc...

d. Johnny gets $75 per 6 hours --> 75/6 = $12.50 per hour

Doug gets $55 per 6 hours --> 55/6 = $9.1666... per hour

e. Carry on the table for Doug all the way to 1, so you can see the how much Doug gets paid for 1 hour of work (i.e. the minimum).

The unit rate is already on the graph for Johnny.

HOPE THIS HELPED :)

P.S. Mate cld you please give me Brainliest? That table took so much dam work

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement illustrates the distributive property? <br> Please help
bogdanovich [222]
<span>It's letter C

Addition, you can have 6 + 107 = 113 </span>
<span>Commutative Property by moving: 107 + 6 = 113 </span>
<span>Associative Property by grouping: (3 + 3) + (100 + 7 ) = 113 </span>
<span>Distributive Property by allotting: 2 (3) + 107 = 113   </span>

<span>Multiplication, you can have 6 x 107 = 642 </span>
<span>Commutative Property by moving: 107 x 6 = 642 </span>
<span>Associative Property by grouping: (3 + 3) x (100 + 7 ) = 642 </span>
<span>Distributive Property by allotting: 2(3) x 107 = 642<span>
</span></span>
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is 8-4/5f&gt;-14-2f
    14·2 answers
  • Simplify: 3x(-11x + 1) A) -33x2 + 3x B) -33x2 + 1 C) -33x + 1 D) -30x
    14·1 answer
  • What is 0.77 as a fraction,and what is 32% of 68????
    9·2 answers
  • What do u do when you have a best friend for 7 years and they stab u in the back, and talk about u to your other friends and the
    12·2 answers
  • 5x + 9 equals 2x + 12. What is the value of x?
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What are the things needed by plants to make their own food?
    15·2 answers
  • I need the answers and the work plsss help
    10·2 answers
  • Which expression is equivalent to 0.09 X 27.3?
    9·1 answer
  • Help please…. I need an answer and explaination
    9·2 answers
  • What is the perimeter of the pentagon below? 3.2 cm?​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!