Okay to split a segment in half you just need to find the midpoint of the two endpoints. Mathematically this is just the average of the coordinates of the endpoints which is:
mp=((x1+x2)/2, (y1+y2)/2)
Which in this case is:
mp=((-2+3)/2, (4+7)/2)
mp=(1/2, 11/2)
mp=(0.5, 5.5)
So the x-coordinate by itself is just 0.5, or answer c.
Angle 1 and angle 3 are vertically opposite angles. And both angles are congruent with each other.
<h3>What is an angle?</h3>
The angle is the distance between the intersecting lines or surfaces. The angle is also expressed in degrees. The angle is 360 degrees for one complete spin.
Supplementary angle - Two angles are said to be supplementary angles if their sum is 180 degrees.
Line L and line M intersect each other.
Angle 1 and angle 2 are supplementary angles.
∠1 + ∠2 = 180° ...1
Angle 2 and angle 3 are supplementary angles.
∠2 + ∠3 = 180° ...2
From equations 1 and 2, then we have
∠1 + ∠2 = ∠2 + ∠3
∠1 = ∠3
The vertically opposite angles are angle 1 and angle 3. Furthermore, the two angles line up perfectly.
More about the angled link is given below.
brainly.com/question/15767203
#SPJ1
It’s c since the line goes down 5 and the y intercept is 3 so it would be y=-5x+3
Answer:
Jaya can afford to rent a car 4 days while staying within her budget.
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality would have to indicate that the cost of renting a car has to be less than or equal to $230. The cost to rent a car is equal to the cost per day for the number of days plus the price per mile for the number of miles, which is:
53.75x+0.12y≤230, where:
x is the number of days the car is rented
y is the number of miles driven
As the statement says that she plans to drive 125 miles, you can replace "y" with this value and solve for x:
53.75x+0.12(125)≤230
53.75x+15≤230
53.75x≤230-15
53.75x≤215
x≤215/53.75
x≤4
According to this, the answer is that Jaya can afford to rent a car 4 days while staying within her budget.
A statement that follows with little or no proof required from an already proven statement. For example, it is a theorem<span> in geometry that the angles opposite two congruent sides of a triangle are also congruent. A </span>corollary<span> to that statement is that an equilateral triangle is also equiangular</span>
