Generalizations and analogies are types of inductive arguments.
An inductive argument is the use of accumulated evidence about something specific to support a general conclusion. Inductive reasoning is used to show the probability that an argument will prove true in the future.
In inductive arguments, the apparent truth of a statement is verified by examples that have been proven or turned out to be true. Inductive reasoning may make statements appear to be true until an exception is encountered.
learn more about argument here: brainly.com/question/3775579
#SPJ4
Answer:
The focus of classical and operant conditioning is on external stimuli, responses and reinforcement; the focus of the cognitive learning approach is on internal thoughts and expectations of learning.
Explanation:
Classical and operant conditioning focus on the observable, such as <em>conducts and behaviors</em> the individual carries out. Both conditioning types try to produce a specific behavior on the individual through <em>stimulus, responses and reinforcement. </em>
Meanwhile, the cognitive learning approach, as the name states, focuses on the individual's cognition, meaning <em>its internal functions and processes,</em> saying there's more to the individual than what is observable. It focuses on one's <em>expectations</em> regarding learning.
