Answer:
a. The Equal Protection Clause is a clause from the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The clause provides that "nor shall any State [...] deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".
Its purpose is to apply substantially more constitutional restrictions against the states than had applied before the Civil War. Hence, in Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), Supreme Court held that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause while bodies doing redistricting must be conscious of race to the extent that they must ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act.
While in the case of Easley v. Cromartie, 532 U.S. 234 (2001), Supreme Court held that the State violated the Equal Protection Clause in drawing the 1997 boundaries was based on clearly erroneous findings.
b. In the case of Easley v. Cromartie, an appeal from the decision given in hunt v. Cromartie was filed in the supreme court of the United States by Easley. In hunt v. Cromartie, the court held that the legislature of North Carolina did not use the factor of race while drawing the boundaries in the twelfth congressional district,1992. It was held by the court that the legislature did not violate the equal protection clause of the constitution and no evidence to prove that legislature set its boundaries on a racial basis rather than a political basis.
In Easley v Cromartie the appeal was that drawing the boundaries for voting violated the equal protection clause of the constitution. The supreme court of the United States held that the decision of the district court is erroneous because it actually relied upon racial factors and this is not in the interest of the state.
In Shaw v. Reno the court concluded that the plan of North Carolina tried to segregate the voters on the basis of race.
Answer:
In ties with Genghis, this culminated in a final breach. In the west of the empire, Jochi fled to his lands and never returned to Mongolia. In1226, he died. His sons, Batu Khan and Orda Khan, inherited his estate, collectively known as Jochi's Ulus.
i rewrote it for you
Answer:
seek for permission from the local government or educate the public about your school program
The antigen's foreignness is the most important determinant of immunogenicity when considering an antigen.
An antigen in immunology is a molecule, molecular structure, foreign particle, pollen grain, etc. that may attach to a particular antibody or T-cell receptor. Antigens within the body may cause an immunological response.
Antigens are outside elements. Normally, the body's defence cells don't react to molecules that belong to it (self antigen). A substance's antigenicity is often correlated with its foreignness . When compared to antigen from other members of the same species, it is less antigenic.
A foreign substance must make up the immunogen. Only substances that are not normally found in the body or exposed to the cells of the particular immune system trigger immune reactions. The immune system will distinguish between "self" and "non-self" in normal circumstances.
To learn more about antigen, refer from
brainly.com/question/15694610
#SPJ4
Answer:
D) Uses the pooled experience of senior and middle managers to estimate the total project duration and cost.
Explanation:
The consensus method has been used in the solution of the problem in medicine and health. Its main purpose is to clarify the controversy between the agreement of a subject. It has been created a consensus strategy for the structured environment by the expert when you have been employed and expertly provide all information that is applicable for the solution of the problem that will be more justifiable and reliable. It is a dynamic and creative method of decision making. We use this method because we have very little control over our lives in the world so many of the decision has been taken for us by politicians, advocates, judges, medical officers, doctors, etc.
