Are they're answers or what
The US never wanted to join World War II so they isolated themselves from everything that was going on and tried to stay neutral (Over time, we sided with the Allies). Mainly, we entered due to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. After the bombing, the US decided to declare war on Japan. Soon after, Nazi Germany's leader declared war on the US and then the US was officially in the war.
So, all in all, it was the bombing of Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.
Hope this helps :)
As a result, in 1819 a court case involving the existence of the national bank<span> made it all the way to the Supreme Court. </span>In the<span> case of Maryland vs. McCulloch, the </span>state<span> of Maryland </span>attempted to put a halt on operations at the Second Bank of the United States<span>. :)</span>
All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
During World War I, many African Americans living in the South moved to northern cities primarily because "<span>(1) more workers were needed in industry" in the north, which was friendlier to blacks as well. </span>