Answer:
The Kmart was held by the court not liable because David assumed the risks of sledding.
Explanation:
Negligent actions are those actions that come under the rubric of tort actions. To prove negligent actions against a person or a company, the plaintiff is required to prove four things in court– duty, breach, causation, and damages.
In the given case, the court will not be held Kmart liable because David (the consumer) was aware of the risks involved in the sledding. Therefore, the case of negligent actions is not applicable for Kmart.
Answer:
$14,76
Explanation:
Using a single plantwide factory overhead rate based on direct labor hours, the factory overhead rate for the year is $14,76.
Answer:
Production Possibility Frontier (PPF or PPC)
All points inside PPF are inefficient points. These points are attainable (e.g., point U), but they are not using the resources at the fullest.
The answer is C, good luck!
Answer:
greenwashing
Explanation:
Greenwashing -
It is the process , where the company spends more amount of time and monetary value on marketing the company as environmentally friendly , rather than decreasing the impact on environment , is referred to as greenwashing.
It is basically a advertising stunt , in order to mislead the consumers , who buys the products just because the product is environmentally friendly.
Hence, from the question ,
the practice performed by the company is greenwashing.