Dividends that were paid last year = $200
Retained earnings = $522
Net Income = Retained earnings + Dividends paid = 200+522 =722
Tax rate was 38%.
Earnings before tax (EBT) = Net income/ (1-tax rate) =722/(1-0.38) = 1,164.52
Interest expense= 624
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) = EBT + interest expense = 1,164.52 + 624 = 1,788.52
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) = 1,788.52
Answer:
$8,000
Explanation:
Given that
Profit = $1,200
Cost = 85% of sales
Profit = 15%
We know that
Sales = Cost + Profit
= 85% + 15%
= 100%
So sales percentage is 100%
Now we use the unitary method to find out the extra sales which would be
= Profit × sales percentage ÷ profit percentage
= $1,200 × 100% ÷ 15%
= $8,000
Answer:
The correct answer is D. For general obligation bonds, the source of income backing the issue.
Explanation:
There is no requirement to disclose the source of income that supports a general obligation issue because it must be a taxing power. The MSRB requires that the type of income that supports an income bond issue be disclosed, as well as the name of the corporate guarantor of the industrial income bonds. The dates of the calls "in their entirety" must also be disclosed in the customer confirmations, as they may affect the price of the issuance according to the rules of the MSRB (the MSRB requires that if a bond quoted based on performance is negotiated with a premium, and if it is enforceable "in its entirety" on pre-established dates and prices, then the dollar price must be calculated at the date of the call instead of the expiration date, since it is most likely to be called ).
Answer:
Self employment tax will be $24000
So option (e) will be correct option
Explanation:
We have given that earning from outside consulting service = $30000
Deductible amount paid in connection with consulting service = $6000
We have to find the self employment tax
Self employment tax is the difference of earning from outside source and deductible amount
So self employment tax = $30000 - $6000 = $24000
So option (e) will be correct option
Answer: in personam jurisdiction
Explanation: The “long-arm statute,” is a law in majority of states that explains when a court can have in personam jurisdiction over parties who do not reside in that state. Certain conditions must be met for the court to have this jurisdiction. In general, the cause of action should have occurred in the state where the case is being filed; the defendant was personally served with the court papers in the state; or the defendant has a minimum contact with the state.
In personam jurisdiction is defined as a court's jurisdiction over the parties in a lawsuit, that is, it has both the authority to rule on the law and evidences of a suit and the power to enforce its decision upon all parties to the suit.
