Answer:
Standing to Sue.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, in order to receive the court's attention, the litigant must demonstrate standing to sue- the person must show that her or his interest in the outcome of the controversy is sufficiently direct and substantial as to justify the courts consideration. Litigant must show that he or she is personally suffering, or will be suffering, injury. In other words, this means that, the person who brings forth a suit has to be from a proper party that requests adjudication for the particular case involved.
Answer:
The correct answer would be true. Both positions require faith.
Explanation:
Answer: Lenski would note that Richard’s high income but low occupational prestige demonstrates a condition of STATUS INCONSISTENCY.
Explanation: As the word inconsistency means an incompatibility between two propositions. Status inconsistency is defined as a situation whereby an individual's social position is incompatible with their social status. An example is given in the question, a janitor usually is associated with low pay. When a janitor is associated with high pay, it is termed status inconsistency. Because the social position is not compatible with the social standard.
When individuals experience status inconsistency, their likely choice of behaviiur is to claim the higher status.
<span>American indian children are less segregated in schools than African American children</span>
Answer:
Risky behavior can be caused by a variety of factors including bad influence, drugs and alcohol, or domestic problems
Explanation:
Please mark as brainlyist ;-;
Please.
;-;
