You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Your equation for number one is 600,788,188/760,507,625 = x/100
After cross multiplying you will get 760,507,625x = 60,078,818,800
Then you will divide by <span>760,507,625 to isolate the varible to get 78.99 = x.
Your equation in number two is 80/143 = x/100 because when you subtract 143 by 63 you get 80, the amount of males in the room. Then you cross multiply to get, 143x = 8000. Then you would divide both sides by 143 to isolate the varible to get 55%</span>
The first thing you should know is that by definition:
d = v * t
Where
d: distance
v: speed
t: time
We then have to clear the time:
t = (d) / (v)
Substituting the values:
t = (6000) / (200)
t = 30 minutes
Answer:
It will take a raindrop to travel 6000m about:
t = 30 minutes
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The 60 inch is diagonal of or the hypotenuse of the TV so we are going to use a^2+b^2=c^2 and let width to be a, then we solve the problem.
a^2=c^2-b^2
oh, take the square root of both sides.
a=((c^2-b^2))^(1/2)
plug 60 for c, 32 for b, and the Width is equal to 50.75 for significant figures.
