The Pacific ocean hope it helps
In the traumatic aftermath of World War One, many questioned whether man's civilization had revealed a dooming weakness, and if one of its greatest achievements—democracy—was only a fragile ideal. Did the war to make the world "safe for democracy" expose a world unfit for democracy? And what about America? For 130 years the republic had survived chronic growing pains and a murderous civil war, but was it, too, displaying signs of dissolution and rot? Voter apathy, corruption in city politics, the "tyranny of the fifty-one percent," the suppression of black voting in the South—American democracy seemed worn, cracked, and vulnerable.
plz mark me as brainliest :)
<span>The correct answers are 1)C The medieval era was the age of feudalism, a system that was already declining after the Black Death, but was rapidly being removed after this War (leading to the supremacy of royalty and more "democratic" tendencies); 2)A The Medieval Age was focused on the Church's/Pope's huge and unquestioned influence (on par with the kings' power at the time); answers b. and. c. are almost senseless regarding the quesiton itself, D. led the way to Protestantism and other religious branches, but it was the self-awareness that people acquired, that mainly led to the end of Medieval Era.</span>
Answer:
Lincoln did not believe he, as the president, had the power under the Constitution to abolish slavery where it already existed. Nor did he want to anger the four slave states that remained in the Union. He also knew that most Northern Democrats were against emancipation.
Explanation:
