Answer:
both supported limiting the number of new arrivals, and argued that the growing immigration population had created social problems
Explanation:
Progressive reformers were known for their movement to end corruption,improve welfare and protection of citizens as well as increase government intervention I'm making this possible. It originated from the need to work on issues that had freshly arisen at the time such as industrialization, urbanization and immigration and corruption.
The progressive era(1890s to 1920s)in America was a time of negative views on immigration. Progressive movement for Americams during this period consisted nativism with the belief that a benevolent immigramt policy was bad for the country.
Differential treatment of interracial and intraracial sexual assaults continued even after passage of the fourteenth amendment, which outlawed explicit statutory racial discrimination, it is one of the post-Civil War amendments, and includes, among others, the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause, it was proposed on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868, the amendment provides a broad definition of national citizenship, which overrides the decision of Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had excluded slaves and their descendants, from possessing constitutional rights,
The purpose of this passage from the Constitution is to identify the jurisdiction of the federal court. This passage is laying out what kind of cases the Court will hear.
The answer is : no, if the safety of being insured was worth more to her than the monetary cost of the premium
For example, A soccer athlete paid insurance premium for $100,000 a year while he get an annual salary of $15,000,000 a year
if the clause was met, he'll get $ 20,000,000 from the insurance claim.
In this case, it more beneficial if the athlete still kept his leg because he can easily get more than $ 20,000,000 by two years of working
hope this helps
Answer:
I think this would be defined as discrimination
