Answer:
A function that gives the work required in foot-lbs to lift the bucket up x feet from the ground is
and the work to get the bucket to the top of the cliff is 3726 foot-lbs
Step-by-step explanation:
Work done to lift the rope by distance x feet:

Work done to lift the bucket by distance x feet:

On reaching top 7 gallons of water spilled out so , on going up by x feet
gallons of water spilled out.
a function that gives the work required in foot-lbs to lift the bucket up x feet from the ground:

Now the work to get the bucket to the top of the cliff i.e. x =35

W=3726
Hence, a function that gives the work required in foot-lbs to lift the bucket up x feet from the ground is
and the work to get the bucket to the top of the cliff is 3726 foot-lbs
Given the table below representing the number of hours of television nine Math II class students watched the night before a big test on
triangles
along with the grades they each earned on that test.
![\begin{center} \begin{tabular} {|c|c|} Hours Spent Watching TV & Grade on Test (out of 100) \\ [1ex] 4 & 71 \\ 2 & 81 \\ 4 & 62 \\ 1 & 86 \\ 3 & 77 \\ 1 & 93 \\ 2 & 84 \\ 3 & 80 \\ 2 & 85 \end{tabular} \end{center}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bcenter%7D%0A%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%0A%7B%7Cc%7Cc%7C%7D%0AHours%20Spent%20Watching%20TV%20%26%20Grade%20on%20Test%20%28out%20of%20100%29%20%20%5C%5C%20%5B1ex%5D%0A4%20%26%2071%20%5C%5C%20%0A2%20%26%2081%20%5C%5C%20%0A4%20%26%2062%20%5C%5C%20%0A1%20%26%2086%20%5C%5C%20%0A3%20%26%2077%20%5C%5C%20%0A1%20%26%2093%20%5C%5C%20%0A2%20%26%2084%20%5C%5C%20%0A3%20%26%2080%20%5C%5C%20%0A2%20%26%2085%0A%5Cend%7Btabular%7D%0A%5Cend%7Bcenter%7D)
Let the number the number of hours of television each of the students watched the night before the test be x while the grades they each earned on that test be y.
We use the following table to find the equation of the line of best fit of the regression analysis of the data.
![\begin{center} \begin{tabular} {|c|c|c|c|} x & y & x^2 & xy \\ [1ex] 4 & 71 & 16 & 284 \\ 2 & 81 & 4 & 162 \\ 4 & 62 & 16 & 248 \\ 1 & 86 & 1 & 86 \\ 3 & 77 & 9 & 231 \\ 1 & 93 & 1 & 93 \\ 2 & 84 & 4 & 168 \\ 3 & 80 & 9 & 240 \\ 2 & 85 & 4 & 170 \\ [1ex]\Sigma x=22 & \Sigma y=719 & \Sigma x^2=64 & \Sigma xy=1,682 \end{tabular} \end{center}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Bcenter%7D%20%5Cbegin%7Btabular%7D%20%7B%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7Cc%7C%7D%20x%20%26%20y%20%26%20x%5E2%20%26%20xy%20%5C%5C%20%5B1ex%5D%204%20%26%2071%20%26%2016%20%26%20284%20%5C%5C%202%20%26%2081%20%26%204%20%26%20162%20%5C%5C%204%20%26%2062%20%26%2016%20%26%20248%20%5C%5C%201%20%26%2086%20%26%201%20%26%2086%20%5C%5C%203%20%26%2077%20%26%209%20%26%20231%20%5C%5C%201%20%26%2093%20%26%201%20%26%2093%20%5C%5C%202%20%26%2084%20%26%204%20%26%20168%20%5C%5C%203%20%26%2080%20%26%209%20%26%20240%20%5C%5C%202%20%26%2085%20%26%204%20%26%20170%20%5C%5C%20%5B1ex%5D%5CSigma%20x%3D22%20%26%20%5CSigma%20y%3D719%20%26%20%5CSigma%20x%5E2%3D64%20%26%20%5CSigma%20xy%3D1%2C682%20%5Cend%7Btabular%7D%20%5Cend%7Bcenter%7D)
Recall that the equation of the line of best fit of a regression analysis is given by

where:

and


Thus, the equation of the line of best fit is given by y = 97.95 - 7.391x
<span>A student that watched 1.5 hours of TV will have a score given by
y = 97.95 - 7.391(1.5) = 97.95 - 11.0865 = 86.8635
Therefore, </span><span>a student’s score if he/she watched 1.5 hours of TV to the nearest whole number is 87.</span>
Answer: Picture is blury for me I can not see it well enough
Step-by-step explanation:
All i see is the 8 ft and 17ft cant see any of the other numbers
Answer:
(1, 5)
Step-by-step explanation:
The solution to the system of equations is the point of intersection of the two lines. From inspection of the graph, the point of intersection is at (1, 5).
<u>Proof</u>
The solution to a system of equations is the point at which the two lines meet.
⇒ g(x) = f(x)
⇒ 3x + 2 = |x - 4| + 2
⇒ 3x = |x - 4|
⇒ 3x = x - 4 and 3x = -(x - 4)
⇒ 3x = x - 4
⇒ 2x = -4
⇒ x = -2
Inputting x = -2 into the 2 equations:
⇒ g(-2) = 3 · -2 + 2 = -4
⇒ f(-2) = |-2 - 4| + 2 = 8
Therefore, as the y-values are different, x = -2 is NOT a solution
⇒ 3x = -(x - 4)
⇒ 3x = 4 - x
⇒ 4x = 4
⇒ x = 1
Inputting x = 1 into the 2 equations:
⇒ g(1) = 3 · 1 + 2 = 5
⇒ f(1) = |1 - 4| + 2 = 5
Therefore, as the y-values are the same, x = 1 IS a solution
and the solution is (1, 5)
First, find the area for the kitchen floor: 16.5*15=247.5 squared feet
Then find the area for one tile: 0.5*0.5=0.25 squared feet
Finally, divide the mayor area between the minor: 247.5/0.25= 990 tiles.
Also you can do it in this another way:
First, divide length of the kitchen floor between the length of one tile: 16.5/0.5=33
Then, do the same for the height: 15/0.5=30
Finally multyply both results: 33*30= 990 tiles.