1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
il63 [147K]
2 years ago
15

Indicate the most appropriate if-then statement that the English sentence represents: People 25 years or older do not pay an add

itional car rental fee. A. If a person is 25 years old or older, then the person does not pay and additional car rental fee. B. If a person is 25 years younger or older, then the person does not pay and additional car rental fee. C. If a person does not pay an additional car rental fee, then the person is 25 years old or older D. Unknown
Law
1 answer:
Marta_Voda [28]2 years ago
4 0

Answer: A. If a person is 25 years old or older, then the person does not pay an additional car rental fee.

Explanation:

The sentence is saying that anybody aged 25 years or older, does not need to pay an additional car rental fee.

<em>Option A supports this. </em>

Option B is essentially saying that everyone does not need to pay an additional car rental fee regardless of their age so is wrong.

Option C is wrong because it there may be exemptions for people below the age of 25 when it comes to paying the rental fee so this is wrong as well.

You might be interested in
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending be
Goshia [24]

Answer:

No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.

<em>Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.</em>

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
You may have to go to the web to answer this one because the explanation in this video is a bit vague. The question: what did th
Tema [17]

Answer:

The correct option is E.

Explanation:

That is, the US Supreme Court established that state governments can regulate private industries that affect the "common good" since grain storage facilities were dedicated to public use, therefore , their rates were subject to public regulation.

7 0
3 years ago
Boyd files a suit in a federal district court against Cathy. Cathy loses the suit, appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
ikadub [295]

Answer:

not required to hear the case.

Explanation:

The United States Court of Appeals  is also known as the circuit courts that are the intermediate appellate courts. The US courts of appeals are one of the most powerful as well influential courts in America.

In the context, Boyd flies a case against Cathy in the federal district court where Cathy loses the case. She then makes an appeal to the circuit courts or the United States Court of Appeals for a second circuit but she loses again. Now if Cathy moves to the Supreme Court of the U.S. and makes an appeal, the Supreme Court is not required to hear Cathy's case as she already made an appeal in the Court of Appeals of U.S. and The court has made his judgement.

4 0
3 years ago
Jim and Larry are in the middle of a fight. Jim throws Larry headfirst into a car causing Larry to lose consciousness. What crim
erastovalidia [21]
Self Defense but it’s manslaughter
4 0
3 years ago
The constitutional principle of checks and balances is exemplified by
Jet001 [13]

Answer: BY THE THREE ARMS OF GOVERNMENT (THE EXECUTIVE,THE LEGISLATURE AND THE JUDICIARY)

Explanation:The three arms of Government are an example of the constitutional principle of checks and balance.

Check and balance is the concept enshrined in the a Democratic Constitution where each of the arms of Government act as a watch for the other arm.

The legislature checkmates the activities of The Executive to prevent abuse of Power they can summon the Executive arm if they discovered any anomally.

The Judiciary have the powers to interpret laws to bring about fairness and justice for both the Executive and legislative arms.

The Executive through the president has the power not to sign bills passed by the legislature if it is not in line with existing laws.etc

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Elliot has misrepresented himself by acting in the capacity of a real estate salesperson without being licensed by the State of
    5·1 answer
  • Why should Amy Coney Barrett be confirmed to become the next Associate Supreme Court Justice? Pleaseeee helpppp!
    13·2 answers
  • Question 29 (3 points)
    7·1 answer
  • Matt goes out to dinner at 6pm and has 5 beers (12 oz) with his dinner. He then goes out
    12·2 answers
  • What are some of the differences between the adult and juvenile court processes and systems?
    15·2 answers
  • If somebody is proven guilty what can be the charges???? i dont know
    9·2 answers
  • Identify two reasons why you agree or disagree with structural functionalism<br><br> -Sociology
    10·1 answer
  • Grammarly is trash<br><br><br> 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999+ social credit
    10·1 answer
  • The removal of a statute of ______ led to protests in charlottesville.
    12·2 answers
  • Identify faulty comparisons caused Captain Walter Lord to fail to take action to help the Titanic.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!