Answer:
See below:
Explanation:
Separate but equal is a contradictory idea. Why must equal things be separate in the first place? Firstly, as many know, America's history with the concept has been deceptive. For example, the "colored" restrooms were poorly looked after, while the "white" bathrooms were typically well taken care of, more so than the other bathrooms anyway. The idea was that because different races cannot coexist, we should be separated but given equal resources to survive. The only reason one would legally separate races is because they believed one race to be superior in value to the others. Therefore, separate but equal is nothing but a baseless, political pacifier.
Stay cool.<3
Mass communication hope that helps
Answer:
The adverbial clause is "when they went there" and the verb it modifies is "would find", with 'would' being the auxiliary or helping verb.
Explanation:
Adverbial clauses are groups of words that function as an adverb in a sentence. They give an explanation or extra detail about the verb and are dependent clauses, meaning they cannot be used independently as a full sentence.
In the given sentence <em>"when they went there, they would find work",</em> the dependent clause and adverb clause is "when they went there". This clause also helps explain or provide more information for the main clause "they would find work".
Thus, the adverbial clause is "when they went there" and the verb it modifies is "would find", with 'would' being the auxiliary or helping verb.
Answer:
Simple answers. Hope it helps
Answer:
The error in the sentence is that the sentence contains a verb voice shift
Explanation:
Its not run on, it has the subjects, and I don't see any issues with the punctuation.
