1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iren2701 [21]
3 years ago
8

Tracey Sales Co. has predicted the following costs for this year for 500,000 units: Manufacturing Selling and Administrative Var

iable $ 800,000 $250,000 Fixed 1,200,000 300,000 Total $2,000,000 $550,000 What is the markup on variable manufacturing costs needed to break even
Business
1 answer:
Greeley [361]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: 218.75%

Explanation:

In order to breakeven, the variable manufacturing cost would have to be the same as the fixed costs in addition to the administrative costs.

= Fixed costs + Administrative cost

= 1,200,000 + 550,000

= $1,750,000

Variable cost needs to be $1,750,000

It is currently at $800,000 so it needs to increase by:

= 1,750,000 / 800,000 * 100%

= 218.75%

You might be interested in
Red Co. uses the product cost concept of applying the cost-plus approach to product pricing. Below is cost information for the p
hammer [34]

Answer:

b 43.50%

Explanation:

Product Cost = Variable Manufacturing Costs + Fixed Manufacturing Cost

Product Cost = 40,000*($7.00 + $11.00 + $3.00) + $80,000

Product Cost = 40,000*$21 + $80,000

Product Cost = $840,000 + $80,000

Product Cost = $920,000

Markup = Total Selling and Administrative Expenses + Desired Profit

Markup = $2.00*40,000 + $140,000 + $1,200,000*15%

Markup = $80,000 + $140,000 + $180,000

Markup = $400,000

Markup percentage = Markup / Product Cost * 100

Markup percentage = $400,000 / $920,000 * 100

Markup percentage = 0.434783 * 100

Markup percentage = 43.47%

6 0
3 years ago
The risk-free rate of return is 2% and the expected return on the market portfolio is 8%. Oklahoma Oilco has a beta of 2.0 and a
solmaris [256]

Answer:

The multiple choices are as follows:

18.6%

14.0%

22.8%

25.0%

The second option is the correct answer,14%

Explanation:

The capital asset pricing asset model formula for computing a firm's cost of equity according to Miller and Modgiliani is given below:

Ke=Rf+Beta*(Mr-Rf)

Rf is the risk free of 2% which is the return expected from zero risk investment such as government treasury bills.

Beta is how risky an investment in a company is compared to similar businesses operating in similar business sector of the company given as 2.0

Mr is the expected return on market portfolio which 8%

Ke=2%+2*(8%-2%)

Ke=2%+2*(6%)

Ke=2%+12%=14%

3 0
3 years ago
On April 1, 2016, the KB Toy Company purchased equipment to be used in its manufacturing process. The equipment cost $57,200, ha
Harman [31]

Answer:

2016 Depreciation

Dr depreciation expense $5720

Cr Accumulated depreciation               $5720

2017 Depreciation

Dr depreciation expense $5720

Cr Accumulated depreciation               $5720

Journal entries for 2018 expenditure

Dr repairs and maintenance   $2900

Dr Equipment account             $11850

Cr Cash account                                          $14750

2018 Depreciation

Dr depreciation expense          $4800.83

Cr Accumulated depreciation                     $4800.83

Explanation:

There are two policies for depreciating non-current asset  especially when it is acquired part-way through the year like we have here, namely full year depreciation in the year of purchase and none in the year of disposal or proportional depreciation throughout the useful life,I am adopting the former in this question.

Formula for depreciation=cost-residual value/useful life

Yearly depreciation is ($57200-$0)/10=$5720

However,after two years the book value is calculated thus:

Book value=$57200-($5720*2)=$45760

additional cost incurred in enhancing the capacity of the asset would be added :  $45760 +$11,850=$57610

Since the useful life has also been reviewed up to 12 years, the depreciation from now on is $57610/12=$4800.83

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select a business/company that you feel does not understand the psychology of waiting and provide examples in their process wher
kramer

Answer:

Let us pick the case of the organization known as Starbucks. Presently we will give 3 models according to which we feel that it doesn't comprehend the brain science of holding up in their procedure where they could deal with the client's view of standing by better utilizing the guideline from the Norman and Maister's articles. While holding up at a Starbucks behind a tremendous line, we can have numerous cases :  

a) Uncertain Waits Are Longer than Explained Waits - There is no clarification or sureness with respect to how a lot of time it will take for the espresso or your refreshment to be conveyed while you are in that line. This is questionable as the client's before you would request mass requests which may take additional time than only one espresso. In this way, these holds up are questionable.  

b) Occupied Time Feels Shorter than Unoccupied Time - While you are remaining in that line, you have an inclination that your 5-10 minutes have been squandered which you could have better used busy working or at home. In this manner, the time was abandoned and hence feels a waste. While on the off chance that the time was involved by some different methods in the line, at that point it would have been justified, despite all the trouble to remain in the line.  

c) Individual Waits Feel Longer than Group - Now very likely in a line, we will have people who are standing by solo for their request in the line. In this manner, the performance hold up will feel longer than holding up in an organization of companions or additionally little converses with outsiders or conveying here and there. In this manner, the issue of solo holding up is a distress and it remains.

5 0
3 years ago
During November, the production department of a process operations system completed and transferred to finished goods 31,000 uni
Aleks [24]

Answer:

200,800 units

Explanation:

<u>Calculation of Equivalent units of Production of Conversion Costs</u>

Method : weighted-average method.

Completed and Transferred (181,000 × 100%)             = 181,000

Ending Work In Process (33,000 × 60%)                     =   19,800

Equivalent units of Production of Conversion Costs  = 200,800

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Although many people believe that the only academic path after high school is a college degree if you want to get a good job, th
    9·2 answers
  • The lack of women and minorities in senior management positions can be explained by
    10·1 answer
  • A good example of central planning at work in the U.S. would be: Select one:
    6·1 answer
  • $25, which is higher than what the price would have been if the industry were a pure monopoly $25, which is lower than what the
    11·1 answer
  • A company's strategy has a chance of succeeding only when it is predicated on:
    13·1 answer
  • What is economic studies
    6·2 answers
  • If 1200 dollars is invested at an annual interest rate r compounded monthly, the amount in the account at the end of 3 years is
    7·1 answer
  • The human resources department at a major high tech company recently conducted an employee satisfaction survey of 100 of its 300
    8·1 answer
  • Hertz leases cars to its customers while E*Trade makes stock transaction for its customers. These businesses are _____ organizat
    6·1 answer
  • Name two kind of businesses that you could start in the fashion industry and explain what skills you would need to start them.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!