I would say that it does follow the way in which a writer follows a writing process because they can't see that.
Shakespeare's allusion to Hecuba suggests that Hamlet <span>is impressed by the actor’s ability to cry for a fictional character.
In the excerpt, Hamlet shows his surprise with the fact that the actor shows such emotions such as sadness and tragedy for a character such as Hecuba, someone who has never even existed outside of a novel or poem. He considers that real art.
</span>
<span>Racial Issues: </span>
<span><span>Encouragement of "Damaging" Lifestyles:</span></span>
<span><span>Blasphemous Dialog: </span></span>
<span>Sexual Situations or Dialog: .</span>
<span><span>Violence or Negativity: </span></span>
<span>Presence of Witchcraft: </span>
<span><span>Religious Affiliations (unpopular religions): </span></span>
<span><span>hope this helps :)</span></span>
The monster sees his family escape their cottage, so he burns it down and goes to live off of the land.
<h3>Why does the monster choose to help the family he stays with?</h3>
The monster learns the French language from the home and practices those words by himself. Desiring to keep his cottagers happy, the monster becomes an aid to the family by secretly hauling wood to the cottage and completing repairs, all under the cover of darkness.
<h3>Why did the monster burn the cottage?</h3>
But by the time the monster gets the cottage, the De Laceys have moved out. He sees Felix completing his lease with the landlord, and never sees any of them again. His last link with society eliminated, the monster gives in to rage and a desire for revenge. He burns down the house and heads for Geneva and Victor.
To learn more about Frankenstein, refer
brainly.com/question/21437674
#SPJ9
was sure is the error in this sentence. So the last one is incorrect
