B is the correct answer.
The Supreme Court is the highest court of appeals in the United States.
So, if you lose at the Supreme Court, you have lost and there is no appeal to a higher court.
Supreme Court litigators are often canny strategists who know when it is appropriate to bring a case that might have a chance of winning.
<span>In one sense, I'm not proud of my academic background. Because I ran away from home, therefore I couldn't go to school being a runaway. However, on my 27th birthday I decided to go get my GED. I had two sons by then, and they were starting school. I knew that if I was going to teach them the value of an education, I had to be an example of that. My only regret is that I didn't continue on. The one thing I am proud of was that I was in a class of over 200+ to get my GED. I received a letter telling ,me I would be graduating in the top 10! Who knew?! Proves to me that people shouldn't ever cast doubt on someone, they might just be surprised!</span>
Answer:
Option A -- there is often a conflict between winning political elections and adoption of only productive programs.
Explanation: It's a known fact that, Government action will often result in the counterproductive use of resources because there is often a conflict between winning political elections and adoption of only productive programs. Therefore, Option B, Option C and Option D are wrong in this context.
There is no given choices. However, when I searched for a possible answer to this question, I stumbled across an article that states the following:
The Long-Term Care Homes Act
includes a Residents’ Bill of Rights. Right
number 8 states that “every resident
has the right to be afforded privacy in
treatment and in caring for his or her
personal needs”.
Resident Right 21 entitles residents the right to
meet with a spouse or other person in a room that
assures privacy.
The patient has the right to his or her privacy not only to do her personal hygiene activities but also when he or she is meeting with his or her visitors.
