C because it's 170 + x = 200 so you solve for x basically
The angle of elavation would be 45°, this is because straight up would be represented by 180°, and 90°, would remain as 1200 ft traveled, and half of 90°, is 45° which would double the distance traveled
Answer:
D. H0: p ≤0.36 H1: p>0.36


D. Reject H0. There is sufficient evidence to support the hypothesis that the proportion of admissions officers who visit an applying students' social networking page has increased in the past year
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve this problem, we run a hypothesis test about the population proportion.

The appropriate hypothesis system for this situation is:


Since, the calculated statistic
is greater than critical
, the null hypothesis should be rejected. There is enough statistical evidence to state that the proportion of admissions officers who visit an applying students' social networking page has increased in the past year.
<span><span>x-4x+12=6
-3x+12=6
-3x+12-12=6-12
-3x=-6
-3x/-3=-6/-3
x=2
Plug (2) in for x in L2 and solve for y:
y=2(2)-6
y=4-6
y=-2
The solution (x,y)=(2,-2)
Check in both equations by substituting (x,y)=(2,-2) and see if it equals out:
L1) (2)-2(-2)=6
2+4=6
6=6 L1 checks out.
L2) (-2)=2(2)-6
-2=4-6
-2=-2 L2 checks out also, so we can say with confidence that the solution is right.
</span></span>