Yea yea ma’am yea I did but it wasn’t like that
Answer:
generally receives favorable tax treatment relative to a corporation.
Explanation:
The sole proprietorship is the business organization in which the business is controlled by single person only. The business records would be separated with the owner personal records in this type of business also it would not be classified as a separate legal entity just like corporation
But in this it received the favorable tax treatment as compared with the corporation
Answer:
b. Hold the tires with reasonable care for disposition as the seller instructs.
Explanation:
When goods are non-conforming to contract, the buyer has the right to reject the goods. The seller also has the right to cure the defect or ensure conformity.
1. Buyer's right to reject: In this case the buyer has the right to reject the goods on inspection, and notify the seller within a reasonable amount of time.
2. Seller's right to cure: The seller has the right to cure defect on the goods, and this can be done where there is still time to rectify the defects noticed by the buyer. In this case, the buyer is not due to pay for the goods for the next 30 days.
The seller still has the opportunity to meet the contract standard and close the deal.
So option b is correct. The buyer holds the goods pending decision of seller to either cure defects on goods or retrieve the goods.
<span>Assuming that we consider the standard workday of eight hours, each part would take 18.75 minutes per part completion. In order to complete 1,250 parts, it would take 8.33 days to complete. In order to complete the 1,250 parts, the manufacturer would have to create at least eight work stations to meet the daily demand.</span>
Answer:
The answer is "Whenever a court requires him to use the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, he possibly would succeed".
Explanation:
Res ipsa loquitur is also an English common law doctrine which claims in an action for tort, throughout the absence of direct proof on whether any defendant acted, a jury may conclude neglect of the nature of an illness or incident. It is used in circumstances in which the complainant is not presented sufficient proof that the offender is not liable.
